Commonwealth of Australia Vs Australia Act

by TrueBlue Observer|Published June 4, 2018|10 comments

Commonwealth of Australia or not?

There is a lot of discussion about Australia’s status as a nation. According to the political parties the Australia Act severed Australia from government by the British Crown and established a separate and sovereign Australia.

But did it?

Any change to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 must be approved first by the People of the Commonwealth voting in a Referendums.

The People of the Commonwealth never voted in a referendum to approve the Australia Act. In fact, to bring in such an Act would require three referendums. This did not happen. Therefore, all acts, laws and legislation enacted since that date are invalid. They have no authority.

**When an Attorney-General says the Australia Act was not valid, the political party governments had better pay attention — because We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia are!**

This also means that when We, the People of the Commonwealth, bring our government back into the Realm of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 we are going to have to re-examine every conviction for crimes, every eviction and possession of land, houses, and farms by the unlawful political party system to determine whether these were carried out lawfully.

In the case of people convicted of crimes and currently sitting in jail will have to have their cases reviewed to determine if they require a new lawful trial, as required by the Magna Carta and our Constitution.

In effect, the Australia Act has created a massive political and legal mess that needs to be cleaned up.

Commonwealth of Australia? Didn’t The Australia Act 1986 Sever That?

In 1986 the Parliament voted in The Australia Act 1986, which is the short title of each of a pair of separate but related pieces of legislation: one an Act of the Commonwealth (i.e. federal) Parliament of Australia, the other an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. In Australia they are referred to, respectively, as the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) and the Australia Act 1986 (UK). These nearly identical Acts were passed by the two parliaments, because of uncertainty as to which of the two had the ultimate authority to do so. The Acts came into effect simultaneously.

They were worded:

An Act to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation.

They brought in this Act using Section 51 (xxxviii) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. The exercise within the Commonwealth, at the request or with the concurrence of the Parliaments of all the States directly concerned, of any power which can at the establishment of this Constitution be exercised only by the Parliament of the United Kingdom or by the Federal Council of Australasia.

This mysterious power confers on the Commonwealth, in cooperation with the States, the power to do anything for Australia which only the United Kingdom could do at the time of Federation.

Section 51 (xxxviii) actually reflects Australia’s colonial status in 1901, while lessening its effect by authorising Australians to do most things affecting Australia for themselves. However, this section is so ambiguous that both the British and Australian Parliaments were unsure who had the ultimate authority to change Australia’s legal status. That they acted without at least a referendum of We the People shows that they were acting unlawfully. Under Section 128, any change to the Constitution must be voted on by We the People voting in a referendum. The Australia Act sought to substantially change the status of our Constitution….in effect abrogating it in favour of a new Constitution written by the political parties colluding with each other.

They either ignored, or were not aware of Sections 61 to 68 of our Constitution.

The intent of The Australia Act (Cth and UK) was supposed to eliminate the remaining possibilities for the UK to legislate with effect in Australia, for the UK to be involved in Australian government, and for an appeal from any Australian court to a British court.

Section 61 to 68 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act UK 1900 and Section 61 to 68 of the Commonwealth Constitution 1900 establishes the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia not of Australia. These Sections ensure that our status as the Commonwealth of Australia cannot be changed, as we are and always have been since Federation part of the British Parliament and the Queen (Monarch).

The Prime Minister is the Foreman of the Legislature, part of the Federal Government. This is merely a matter of tradition, as the Constitution does not mention a Prime Minister, or the powers that should limit one. The PM has No Other Authority, Nor Any Say Between The People (Who Are The Commonwealth) and the Monarch. He is merely the leader of the political party that wins any election, and therefore he is automatically appointed Prime Minister by consent of the Political Party he leads.

commonwealth-coat-arms — **The true Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms**

The Governor General is the only and Highest Authority in government acting on behalf of the Crown, along with the Executive, and the GG is the only Authority mentioned in the Constitution.

For the Queen to sign the Australia Act the government is required to hold a referendum in England, and most probably the Empire, to get the permission of the Commonwealth to give away one of Her Realms, in this case the Continent of Australia.

That did not happen!

At the very least it would require permission from the House of Lords, the Keepers of Her Realms and then go to the British Parliament first.

Remember HM Queen Elizabeth II is only the Monarch of the Empire, not the owner.

If the Australia Act got past those hurdles it would then have to go to The People of the Commonwealth of Australia for approval by referendum vote. It did not!

That Referendum would have to come from The People to the Governor General for permission to remove the Constitution, but this cannot happen because the union between Great Britain and Australia is indisolvable. The first eight sections of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 are an Act of the British Parliament and cannot be changed.

The People are the Commonwealth NOT the Government

The People are the States NOT the Government.

It is the Crown in Right of The Commonwealth, not the government.

The Crown is bound by the Constitution which is Quasi Sovereign and The Will of The People.

The Queen is the currently reigning Monarch and is bound by the Constitution under the authority of the Crown – She is not the Crown.

Our Forefathers and the Framers of Our Constitution were too smart for the liars that have sat in Our Parliament since 1919 when PM Billy Hughes, an ALP man, tried to sever our Commonwealth Status and start us on the road to becoming a Republic by enrolling Australia as a Founding Member of the League of Nations – the forerunner to the United Nations.

TIME TO WAKE UP THE TRAITORS

The following explains in detail why the Australia Act is Unconstitutional, Invalid, and Null & Void. It states:

WHEREAS the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth and the Premiers of the States at conferences held in Canberra on 24 and 25 June 1982 and 21 June 1984 agreed on the taking of certain measures to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation:

“constitutional arrangements” = Australia Law as a private company

“conformity” means that the Commonwealth is already a private Company. We the people never voted for this in a referendum =TREASON

To have the “status” “sovereign, independent and federal nation” that means Republican Dictatorship.

Notice: sovereign, independent and federal nation are NOT Sovereign, Independent and Federal Nation. We are NOT yet a Republic.

The Australia Act 1986 Proclamation signed by Bob Hawk with only his printed name is not a legal signature.

All States created an Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was void as the so-called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.

This proves that all State so called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON

Entrenched sections within these Acts are:

Referendum No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy NOT a sovereign, independent and federal nation. = TREASON

Referendum No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 is Referendum entrenched and stipulates

Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867

53.(1) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act namely—

sections 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and this section 53 shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act. = TREASON

Referendum No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 is Referendum entrenched and stipulates Western Australia Constitution Act 1889 Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions 73(2)

A Bill that

expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or
expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or
expressly or impliedly provides that the Legislative Council or the Legislative Assembly shall be composed of members other than members chosen directly by the people;or
expressly or impliedly provides for a reduction in the numbers of the members of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or
expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless
the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and
the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.

= TREASON

WITHOUT these THREE REFERENDUMS taking place ALL Australia Acts are VOID AND SHALL BE OF NO EFFECT AS AN ACT

Therefore all so-called Acts from that date forward are only PURPORTED ACTS and PURPORTED ENACTMENTS = TREASON

The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia, as registered with the Brigalow Corporation. The Queen of Australia is merely a name on the company registration of the Brigalow Corporation. She is not a real person. = TREASON

The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

THEY ARE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS

Political Parties their Religious mates, the Judiciary and their Professors or Law are GUILTY OF TREASON, TREACHERY, AND SABOTAGE of our once-great Commonwealth of Australia.

(If you want to do something to stop the criminal corporate political parties continuing to destroy our nation and our Democracy, sign up for free at Advance Australia Group. We are not a political party. We are a political group of Australians who want to bring back the rule of law under our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901….Click here to Sign Up!)

We support BRIGHTEON VIDEO as a much better alternative to YouTube. Have you tried Brighteon yet?

~ Information supplied by Wayne Glew

Summary of the Australia Act – by Dick Yardley

The Australia Acts 1985 1986

Proclamation signed, Bob Hawk — this is not a legal signature.

The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 done by all States was void as the so called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.

This proves that all State so-called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON

The three Entrenched Referendums are:

No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy, The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was for a sovereign, independent federal nation. To become a sovereign independent nation we had to vote the Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Defender of the Faith, out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON

No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.

13 Amendment of Constitution Act of Queensland

(1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in this section referred to as the Principal Act.

The sections within this Section 13 are referendum entrenched

” Requirement For Referendum

Certain measures to be supported by referendum.

(l) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act

namely- .sections

1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14 and

this section 53

shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON

No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.

14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia

(1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in this section referred to as the Principal Act.

Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions

(2) A Bill that

(a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or

(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for

assent by or in the name of the Queen unless

(f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members

for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and

(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its

presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.NO REFERENDUM = TREASON

The Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 Act No. 143 of 1985 was after

The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 How come the Australia Act came before the Australia (Request and Consent) Act.

The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia = TREASON

The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS

Political Parties their Religious Anglican Church mates, their JUDICIARY and their Professors of LAW are TREASONOUS BASTARDS.

People of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 voted to stay as a Constitutional Monarchy in 1999.

By NOT listening to the People the Political Parties in the State and Federal Governments, their Parliaments kept the TREASON going by using the Australia Act 1986 Act 142 as their Primary Law

The Question

What do we do about all Australian Political Parties using the Australia Acts = TREASON removing all OUR Rights?

REMOVAL OF THE CROWN

Read, save, share.

Criminal Code Compilation Act 1913

PART II.–OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER.

CHAPTER VI.—TREASON AND OTHER OFFENCES AGAINST THE SOVEREIGN’S PERSON AND AUTHORITY.
See s37-39 on scans pictured.

They cannot repeal this Act as its created by UK. (See Attached)
UCC 1-30 all rights reserved without prejudice.
Hansard files
Extract from Hansard
[ASSEMBLY – Tuesday, 25 February 2003]
p4601b-4609a
Ms Sue Walker; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr Jim McGinty
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/f724a3629f0cfcfbc8257570007f4238/$FILE/A36%20S2%2020030225%20p4601b-4609a.pdf

Extract from Hansard

[ASSEMBLY – Thursday, 4 December 2003]
p14291b-14292a
Mr Jim McGinty
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/5ac7243c307177f7c8257570007fdb19/$FILE/A36%20S2%2020031204%20p14291b-14292a.pdf

Extract from Hansard

[ASSEMBLY – Tuesday, 16 December 2003]
p14906c-14922a
Speaker; Mr John Kobelke; Mr Max Trenorden; Mr Rob Johnson; Mr Phillip Pendal; Mr Colin Barnett; Dr Janet
Woollard; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr Jim McGinty; Mr John Bradshaw
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard/hansard.nsf/0/466beaf725f47dbec8257570007fe223/$FILE/A36+S2+20031216+p14906c-14922a.pdf

Extract from Hansard

[COUNCIL – Wednesday, 25 June 2003]
p9159b-9159b
Hon Nick Griffiths
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/9bdebf1cab5831acc825757000800dde/$FILE/C36%20S2%2020030625%20p9159b-9159b.pdf

——————————————————–

10 thoughts on “Commonwealth of Australia Vs Australia Act”

10 comments

Matt milini
June 4, 2018, 12:02 pm

With or without referendum the treasonous maggots do what they want eg australia act, local gov act. These acts are repugnant to our constitutionn thus making state constitutions, laws and courts invalid. Their foundation of lies and deception is crumbling. We the people will restore

Reply
Roger luke Ninham
June 29, 2018, 8:54 am

Treason

Reply
Rob
June 29, 2018, 12:37 pm

If this is true, how is it that not one (1) Judge or Barrister is screaming from the roof tops about this?

Surely, there is at least one (1) person from “legal world” who has a conscience about what you are saying?

Well, in any event, from other items I’ve read and the various videos available, I do believe that there are behind the scenes players that pull the strings of certain politicians and those politicians will be looked after once (if it happens) a constitutional crisis comes along if the wool is pulled over our eyes (like the bandana wearing man who regularly writes about Australia “losing its connection to an antiquated non relevant family…”

Reply
- Mike Holt
  August 4, 2018, 11:06 pm
  
  Some Judges, like Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs (deceased) have and are, but most are now “employed” by the treasonous and unlawful corporate governments and therefore they are paid in unlawful decimal currency. They are bound to The Firm and must act as servants of the The Firm, not for We the People.
  
  Reply
Robert
July 1, 2018, 4:30 am

Why isn’t that traitor hawks arrested 4 treason and also his attorney general why isn’t the queen arresting him and the treasonous bastard politicians nowadays too the constitution is meant to b number 1 law how r they getting away with this treason

Reply
- Dick Yardley
  October 31, 2018, 6:21 pm
  
  The Australia Acts 1985 1986
  Proclamation signed, Bob Hawk this is not a legal signature.
  The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 done by all States was void as the so called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.
  This proves that all State so called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON
  The three Entrenched Referendums are
  
  No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy, The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was for a sovereign, independent federal nation. To become a sovereign independent nation we had to vote the Queen out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. NO REFERENDUM. = TREASON
  
  No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.
  13 Amendment of Constitution Act of Queensland
  (1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in
  this section referred to as the Principal Act.
  The sections within this Section 13 are referendum entrenched
  ” Requirement For Referendum
  53. Certain measures to be supported by referendum.
  (l) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or
  alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly
  in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act
  namely- .sections
  1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14 and
  this section 53
  
  shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen
  unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance
  with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its
  presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no
  effect as an Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
  
  No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.
  14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia
  (1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in
  this section referred to as the Principal Act.
  
  Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions
  73
  
  (2) A Bill that
  (a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of
  Governor; or
  
  (e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of
  this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for
  assent by or in the name of the Queen unless
  
  (f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the
  concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members
  for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly,
  respectively; and
  
  (g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors
  in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its
  presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.
  NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
  
  The Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 Act No. 143 of 1985 was after
  The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 How come the Australia Act came before the Australia (Request and Consent) Act.
  The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia = TREASON
  The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
  TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS
  Political Parties their Religious Mates their JUDICIARY and their Professors of LAW are TREASONOUS BASTARDS.
  
  People of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 voted to stay as a Constitutional Monarchy in 1999.
  
  By NOT listening to the People the Political Parties in the State and Federal Governments, their Parliaments kept the TREASON going by using the Australia Act 1986 Act 142 as their Primary Law
  
  The Question
  What do we do about all Australia Political Parties using the Australia Acts = TREASON removing all OUR Rights ?
  
  Reply
  - kevin
    January 6, 2019, 10:36 pm
    
    All Politicians who were knowingly concerned with the commission of this treachery and all politicians who have been and are a party to this treachery by their silence, should have the contents of their entire estates seized, sold and used to compensate all people who have suffered injury in the courts as a result of this treachery.
    
    Moreover; we MUST, MUST, MUST, get the constitution into every education curriculum as compulsory education. Further more, we must have a referendum to change the constitution to require this constitutional education, in the constitution. We must also word the clause in way that a referendum is required undo these reforms to education curriculum.
    
    Reply
    - Mike Holt
      January 7, 2019, 12:09 am
      
      We are gathering signatures on a My Will letter from millions of Australians to authorise a group of 15 Commonwealth Public Officials to convene a Grand Jury to investigate and prosecute the crimes and treason committed by the Political Parties of Australia. This is your opportunity to help bring these criminals to justice. Read all about how it works, and then download your letter here, My Will Australia, and start gathering signatures.
      
      Reply
Luke
March 10, 2019, 12:53 pm

My Son joined the Australian Army when he left – finished high school some 8 years ago.
At the Swearing in Ceremony, me being a very Patriotic Australian and believing that when we became the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901 that We, the People of Australia though still part of The British Commonwealth, I believed we would have some Autonomy. That the People of Australia would be The Final Arbiters of our Future.
Yes I know we have the Governor General whom I thought was a Honorary Title, well I was wrong there, wasn’t I.
Well back to my Son’s Oath of Allegiance for the Army. I took it for Granted that it would be to “We The People of Australia etc…”
Imagine my SHOCK AND HORROR (I’m afraid I made a scene) when my Son Swore a personal Oath of ALLEGIANCE TO THE QUEEN AND THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR!!
Not the Australian People, Not the Duly Elected Government of Australia, Not even the People of Australia as part of the Duly Elected British Commonwealth BUT THE QUEEN AND THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR!!!
OMG I THINK I FELL OFF THE CHAIR AND WHEN I TRIED TO STAND AND MAKE AN OBJECTION AS A LEGAL AND LOYAL AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN, My wife held me back so as to NOT make a further scene and embarrass my Son further. Though he said he was proud of me, he went with the flow.
I was shocked that Queen Elizebeth and King Charles in his time (I have NO respect for that scum in the slightest!!) The Queen can Issue LEGAL orders to AUSTRALIAN TROOPS to take over the Parliament and the Queen or Charles would be in Charge of AUSTRALIA and install total BRITISH LAW including Gag orders on the Press. Etc. My Son wouldlegally

Reply
- Mike Holt
  March 11, 2019, 8:16 am
  
  Luke, like many other Australians, you have been fooled into thinking that we are sovereign nation, separate from the English Crown. This is the nonsense spread by the political party traitors who are trying desperately to force us to become a Republic. Please read this more articles on our website, starting here: https://www.cirnow.com.au/how-when-did-the-government-commit-treason/ and then read this article and watch the video. It explains what Wayne Goss and Kevin Rudd did to steal our sovereignty and our democracy: https://www.cirnow.com.au/criminals-in-government/ — the video is one hour long, but I bet you will watch it all the way through with your mouth agape at their criminality and sheer smug audacity thinking they could fool We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  
  Reply