Commonwealth of Australia or not?
There is a lot of discussion about Australia’s status as a nation. According to the political parties the Australia Act severed Australia from government by the British Crown and established a separate and sovereign Australia.
But did it?
We can prove that the Australia Act has no power or authority. In a recent court case in the South Australian Supreme Court the judge stated that it is not a lawful Act, and therefore all so-called government claims of authority are null and void.
Click here to download the court transcript and read it for yourself:
Download Transcript
Any change to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 must be approved first by the People of the Commonwealth voting in a Referendums.
The People of the Commonwealth never voted in a referendum to approve the Australia Act. In fact, to bring in such an Act would require three referendums. This did not happen. Therefore, all acts, laws and legislation enacted since that date are invalid. They have no authority.
This also means that when We, the People of the Commonwealth, bring our government back into the Realm of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 we are going to have to re-examine every conviction for crimes, every eviction and possession of land, houses, and farms by the unlawful political party system to determine whether these were carried out lawfully.
In the case of people convicted of crimes and currently sitting in jail will have to have their cases reviewed to determine if they require a new lawful trial, as required by the Magna Carta and our Constitution.
In effect, the Australia Act has created a massive political and legal mess that needs to be cleaned up.
Commonwealth of Australia? Didn’t The Australia Act 1986 Sever That?
In 1986 the Parliament voted in The Australia Act 1986, which is the short title of each of a pair of separate but related pieces of legislation: one an Act of the Commonwealth (i.e. federal) Parliament of Australia, the other an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. In Australia they are referred to, respectively, as the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) and the Australia Act 1986 (UK). These nearly identical Acts were passed by the two parliaments, because of uncertainty as to which of the two had the ultimate authority to do so. The Acts came into effect simultaneously.
They were worded:
An Act to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation.
They brought in this Act using Section 51 (xxxviii) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. The exercise within the Commonwealth, at the request or with the concurrence of the Parliaments of all the States directly concerned, of any power which can at the establishment of this Constitution be exercised only by the Parliament of the United Kingdom or by the Federal Council of Australasia.
This mysterious power confers on the Commonwealth, in cooperation with the States, the power to do anything for Australia which only the United Kingdom could do at the time of Federation.
Section 51 (xxxviii) actually reflects Australia’s colonial status in 1901, while lessening its effect by authorising Australians to do most things affecting Australia for themselves. However, this section is so ambiguous that both the British and Australian Parliaments were unsure who had the ultimate authority to change Australia’s legal status. That they acted without at least a referendum of We the People shows that they were acting unlawfully. Under Section 128, any change to the Constitution must be voted on by We the People voting in a referendum. The Australia Act sought to substantially change the status of our Constitution….in effect abrogating it in favour of a new Constitution written by the political parties colluding with each other.
They either ignored, or were not aware of Sections 61 to 68 of our Constitution.
The intent of The Australia Act (Cth and UK) was supposed to eliminate the remaining possibilities for the UK to legislate with effect in Australia, for the UK to be involved in Australian government, and for an appeal from any Australian court to a British court.
Section 61 to 68 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act UK 1900 and Section 61 to 68 of the Commonwealth Constitution 1900 establishes the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia not of Australia. These Sections ensure that our status as the Commonwealth of Australia cannot be changed, as we are and always have been since Federation part of the British Parliament and the Queen (Monarch).
The Prime Minister is the Foreman of the Legislature, part of the Federal Government. This is merely a matter of tradition, as the Constitution does not mention a Prime Minister, or the powers that should limit one. The PM has No Other Authority, Nor Any Say Between The People (Who Are The Commonwealth) and the Monarch. He is merely the leader of the political party that wins any election, and therefore he is automatically appointed Prime Minister by consent of the Political Party he leads.
The Governor General is the only and Highest Authority in government acting on behalf of the Crown, along with the Executive, and the GG is the only Authority mentioned in the Constitution.
For the Queen to sign the Australia Act the government is required to hold a referendum in England, and most probably the Empire, to get the permission of the Commonwealth to give away one of Her Realms, in this case the Continent of Australia.
That did not happen!
At the very least it would require permission from the House of Lords, the Keepers of Her Realms and then go to the British Parliament first.
Remember HM Queen Elizabeth II is only the Monarch of the Empire, not the owner.
If the Australia Act got past those hurdles it would then have to go to The People of the Commonwealth of Australia for approval by referendum vote. It did not!
That Referendum would have to come from The People to the Governor General for permission to remove the Constitution, but this cannot happen because the union between Great Britain and Australia is indisolvable. The first eight sections of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 are an Act of the British Parliament and cannot be changed.
The People are the Commonwealth NOT the Government
The People are the States NOT the Government.
It is the Crown in Right of The Commonwealth, not the government.
The Crown is bound by the Constitution which is Quasi Sovereign and The Will of The People.
The Queen is the currently reigning Monarch and is bound by the Constitution under the authority of the Crown – She is not the Crown.
Our Forefathers and the Framers of Our Constitution were too smart for the liars that have sat in Our Parliament since 1919 when PM Billy Hughes, an ALP man, tried to sever our Commonwealth Status and start us on the road to becoming a Republic by enrolling Australia as a Founding Member of the League of Nations – the forerunner to the United Nations.
TIME TO WAKE UP THE TRAITORS
The following explains in detail why the Australia Act is Unconstitutional, Invalid, and Null & Void. It states:
An Act to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and Federal nation.
WHEREAS the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth and the Premiers of the States at conferences held in Canberra on 24 and 25 June 1982 and 21 June 1984 agreed on the taking of certain measures to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation:
“constitutional arrangements” = Australia Law as a private company
“conformity” means that the Commonwealth is already a private Company. We the people never voted for this in a referendum =TREASON
To have the “status” “sovereign, independent and federal nation” that means Republican Dictatorship.
Notice: sovereign, independent and federal nation are NOT Sovereign, Independent and Federal Nation. We are NOT yet a Republic.
The Australia Act 1986 Proclamation signed by Bob Hawk with only his printed name is not a legal signature.
All States created an Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was void as the so-called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.
This proves that all State so called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON
Entrenched sections within these Acts are:
Referendum No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy NOT a sovereign, independent and federal nation. = TREASON
Referendum No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 is Referendum entrenched and stipulates
Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867
53.(1) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act namely—
sections 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and this section 53 shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act. = TREASON
Referendum No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 is Referendum entrenched and stipulates Western Australia Constitution Act 1889 Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions 73(2)
A Bill that
- expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or
- expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or
- expressly or impliedly provides that the Legislative Council or the Legislative Assembly shall be composed of members other than members chosen directly by the people;or
- expressly or impliedly provides for a reduction in the numbers of the members of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or
- expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless
- the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and
- the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.
= TREASON
WITHOUT these THREE REFERENDUMS taking place ALL Australia Acts are VOID AND SHALL BE OF NO EFFECT AS AN ACT
Therefore all so-called Acts from that date forward are only PURPORTED ACTS and PURPORTED ENACTMENTS = TREASON
The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia, as registered with the Brigalow Corporation. The Queen of Australia is merely a name on the company registration of the Brigalow Corporation. She is not a real person. = TREASON
The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
THEY ARE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS
Political Parties their Religious mates, the Judiciary and their Professors or Law are GUILTY OF TREASON, TREACHERY, AND SABOTAGE of our once-great Commonwealth of Australia.
(If you want to do something to stop the criminal corporate political parties continuing to destroy our nation and our Democracy, sign up for free at Advance Australia Group. We are not a political party. We are a political group of Australians who want to bring back the rule of law under our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901….Click here to Sign Up!)
We support BRIGHTEON VIDEO as a much better alternative to YouTube. Have you tried Brighteon yet?
~ Information supplied by Wayne Glew
Summary of the Australia Act – by Dick Yardley
The Australia Acts 1985 1986
Proclamation signed, Bob Hawk — this is not a legal signature.
The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 done by all States was void as the so called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.
This proves that all State so-called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON
The three Entrenched Referendums are:
No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy, The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was for a sovereign, independent federal nation. To become a sovereign independent nation we had to vote the Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Defender of the Faith, out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.
13 Amendment of Constitution Act of Queensland
(1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in this section referred to as the Principal Act.
The sections within this Section 13 are referendum entrenched
” Requirement For Referendum
- Certain measures to be supported by referendum.
(l) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act
namely- .sections
1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14 and
this section 53
shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.
14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia
(1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in this section referred to as the Principal Act.
Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions
73
(2) A Bill that
(a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or
(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for
assent by or in the name of the Queen unless
(f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members
for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and
(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its
presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
The Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 Act No. 143 of 1985 was after
The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 How come the Australia Act came before the Australia (Request and Consent) Act.
The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia = TREASON
The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS
Political Parties their Religious Anglican Church mates, their JUDICIARY and their Professors of LAW are TREASONOUS BASTARDS.
People of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 voted to stay as a Constitutional Monarchy in 1999.
By NOT listening to the People the Political Parties in the State and Federal Governments, their Parliaments kept the TREASON going by using the Australia Act 1986 Act 142 as their Primary Law
The Question
What do we do about all Australian Political Parties using the Australia Acts = TREASON removing all OUR Rights?
REMOVAL OF THE CROWN
Read, save, share.
2003 the Parliament removed the Crown and replaced it with State using the Acts Amendments and Repeal (Courts and Legal Practice) Act 2003 (WA) s Amendments about the Crown, (without referendum)
121. Bail Act 1982 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s121.html
122. Children’s Court of Western Australia Act 1988 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s122.html
123. The Criminal Code amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s123.html
124. Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1991 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s124.html
125. District Court of Western Australia Act 1969 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s125.html
126. Family Court Act 1997 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s126.html
127. Juries Act 1957 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s127.html
128. Justices Act 1902 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s128.html
129. Local Courts Act 1904 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s129.html
130. Supreme Court Act 1935 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s130.html
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/num…/aaaralpa200365o2003458/
Criminal Code Compilation Act 1913
PART II.–OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER.
CHAPTER VI.—TREASON AND OTHER OFFENCES AGAINST THE SOVEREIGN’S PERSON AND AUTHORITY.
See s37-39 on scans pictured.
They cannot repeal this Act as its created by UK. (See Attached)
UCC 1-30 all rights reserved without prejudice.
Hansard files
Extract from Hansard
[ASSEMBLY – Tuesday, 25 February 2003]
p4601b-4609a
Ms Sue Walker; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr Jim McGinty
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/f724a3629f0cfcfbc8257570007f4238/$FILE/A36%20S2%2020030225%20p4601b-4609a.pdf
Extract from Hansard
[ASSEMBLY – Thursday, 4 December 2003]
p14291b-14292a
Mr Jim McGinty
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/5ac7243c307177f7c8257570007fdb19/$FILE/A36%20S2%2020031204%20p14291b-14292a.pdf
Extract from Hansard
[ASSEMBLY – Tuesday, 16 December 2003]
p14906c-14922a
Speaker; Mr John Kobelke; Mr Max Trenorden; Mr Rob Johnson; Mr Phillip Pendal; Mr Colin Barnett; Dr Janet
Woollard; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr Jim McGinty; Mr John Bradshaw
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard/hansard.nsf/0/466beaf725f47dbec8257570007fe223/$FILE/A36+S2+20031216+p14906c-14922a.pdf
Extract from Hansard
[COUNCIL – Wednesday, 25 June 2003]
p9159b-9159b
Hon Nick Griffiths
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/9bdebf1cab5831acc825757000800dde/$FILE/C36%20S2%2020030625%20p9159b-9159b.pdf
——————————————————–
58 thoughts on “Commonwealth of Australia Vs Australia Act”
With or without referendum the treasonous maggots do what they want eg australia act, local gov act. These acts are repugnant to our constitutionn thus making state constitutions, laws and courts invalid. Their foundation of lies and deception is crumbling. We the people will restore
Treason
If this is true, how is it that not one (1) Judge or Barrister is screaming from the roof tops about this?
Surely, there is at least one (1) person from “legal world” who has a conscience about what you are saying?
Well, in any event, from other items I’ve read and the various videos available, I do believe that there are behind the scenes players that pull the strings of certain politicians and those politicians will be looked after once (if it happens) a constitutional crisis comes along if the wool is pulled over our eyes (like the bandana wearing man who regularly writes about Australia “losing its connection to an antiquated non relevant family…”
Some Judges, like Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs (deceased) have and are, but most are now “employed” by the treasonous and unlawful corporate governments and therefore they are paid in unlawful decimal currency. They are bound to The Firm and must act as servants of the The Firm, not for We the People.
Why isn’t that traitor hawks arrested 4 treason and also his attorney general why isn’t the queen arresting him and the treasonous bastard politicians nowadays too the constitution is meant to b number 1 law how r they getting away with this treason
The Australia Acts 1985 1986
Proclamation signed, Bob Hawk this is not a legal signature.
The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 done by all States was void as the so called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.
This proves that all State so called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON
The three Entrenched Referendums are
No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy, The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was for a sovereign, independent federal nation. To become a sovereign independent nation we had to vote the Queen out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. NO REFERENDUM. = TREASON
No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.
13 Amendment of Constitution Act of Queensland
(1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in
this section referred to as the Principal Act.
The sections within this Section 13 are referendum entrenched
” Requirement For Referendum
53. Certain measures to be supported by referendum.
(l) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or
alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly
in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act
namely- .sections
1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14 and
this section 53
shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen
unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance
with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its
presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no
effect as an Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.
14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia
(1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in
this section referred to as the Principal Act.
Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions
73
(2) A Bill that
(a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of
Governor; or
(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of
this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for
assent by or in the name of the Queen unless
(f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the
concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members
for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly,
respectively; and
(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors
in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its
presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.
NO REFERENDUM = TREASON
The Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 Act No. 143 of 1985 was after
The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 How come the Australia Act came before the Australia (Request and Consent) Act.
The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia = TREASON
The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.
TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS
Political Parties their Religious Mates their JUDICIARY and their Professors of LAW are TREASONOUS BASTARDS.
People of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 voted to stay as a Constitutional Monarchy in 1999.
By NOT listening to the People the Political Parties in the State and Federal Governments, their Parliaments kept the TREASON going by using the Australia Act 1986 Act 142 as their Primary Law
The Question
What do we do about all Australia Political Parties using the Australia Acts = TREASON removing all OUR Rights ?
All Politicians who were knowingly concerned with the commission of this treachery and all politicians who have been and are a party to this treachery by their silence, should have the contents of their entire estates seized, sold and used to compensate all people who have suffered injury in the courts as a result of this treachery.
Moreover; we MUST, MUST, MUST, get the constitution into every education curriculum as compulsory education. Further more, we must have a referendum to change the constitution to require this constitutional education, in the constitution. We must also word the clause in way that a referendum is required undo these reforms to education curriculum.
We are gathering signatures on a My Will letter from millions of Australians to authorise a group of 15 Commonwealth Public Officials to convene a Grand Jury to investigate and prosecute the crimes and treason committed by the Political Parties of Australia. This is your opportunity to help bring these criminals to justice. Read all about how it works, and then download your letter here, My Will Australia, and start gathering signatures.
I tried to get signatures, however some people remarked that a Grand Jury is USA constitution not Australian.
My Son joined the Australian Army when he left – finished high school some 8 years ago.
At the Swearing in Ceremony, me being a very Patriotic Australian and believing that when we became the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901 that We, the People of Australia though still part of The British Commonwealth, I believed we would have some Autonomy. That the People of Australia would be The Final Arbiters of our Future.
Yes I know we have the Governor General whom I thought was a Honorary Title, well I was wrong there, wasn’t I.
Well back to my Son’s Oath of Allegiance for the Army. I took it for Granted that it would be to “We The People of Australia etc…”
Imagine my SHOCK AND HORROR (I’m afraid I made a scene) when my Son Swore a personal Oath of ALLEGIANCE TO THE QUEEN AND THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR!!
Not the Australian People, Not the Duly Elected Government of Australia, Not even the People of Australia as part of the Duly Elected British Commonwealth BUT THE QUEEN AND THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR!!!
OMG I THINK I FELL OFF THE CHAIR AND WHEN I TRIED TO STAND AND MAKE AN OBJECTION AS A LEGAL AND LOYAL AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN, My wife held me back so as to NOT make a further scene and embarrass my Son further. Though he said he was proud of me, he went with the flow.
I was shocked that Queen Elizebeth and King Charles in his time (I have NO respect for that scum in the slightest!!) The Queen can Issue LEGAL orders to AUSTRALIAN TROOPS to take over the Parliament and the Queen or Charles would be in Charge of AUSTRALIA and install total BRITISH LAW including Gag orders on the Press. Etc. My Son wouldlegally
Luke, like many other Australians, you have been fooled into thinking that we are sovereign nation, separate from the English Crown. This is the nonsense spread by the political party traitors who are trying desperately to force us to become a Republic. Please read this more articles on our website, starting here: https://www.cirnow.com.au/how-when-did-the-government-commit-treason/ and then read this article and watch the video. It explains what Wayne Goss and Kevin Rudd did to steal our sovereignty and our democracy: https://www.cirnow.com.au/criminals-in-government/ — the video is one hour long, but I bet you will watch it all the way through with your mouth agape at their criminality and sheer smug audacity thinking they could fool We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia.
What lot of hooey ! The Australian High Court has stated that the Australia Acts were validly enacted . The UK version was enacted because Australia was still a British Dominion . The UK Parliament ( if you understand British law ) passed its version which over rode any previous British Act – to the extent of any inconsistency – so the UK version over rode – its earlier Act – the Australian Constitution Act 1901.
Google Justice Kirby’s High Court Decision about the Australia Act
Do you have a link to this as I cannot find it after an extensive search
What link do you want Robert?
How without a referendum??
I did not see a referendum which was required, therefore this is illegal
No I actually know who the supreme subjects are and that is we the people!
The answer is simple…we are operating under an assumed jurisdiction…this jurisdiction is Papl and is known a the UCC…..Our Lawful Jurisdiction is that of the Commonwealth..Common English Law which are Almighty God’s instruction for good governance enshrined within our Constitution Act…the current Parliament of Australia is not lawful and the term does not appear in the Constitution Act (1901)….Our True and Lawful Parliament is recognised as the Parliament of the Commonwealth and embodies the Rule of Law…any consentual agreement given to the Papal jurisdiction (corporate) is and act of treason against Her Majesty and the Commonwealth…the corporate administrative body known as the Parliament oif Australia is a foriegn power and not a part of the Commonwealth of Australia. (s51(xx.)
And is the head of state (the Queen) aware of this treason by this so-called ‘Government’ of Australia?
She is, but she is powerless to stop the Treason. She has said that only we, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia can resolve our constitutional crisis…and that is just what we are doing. It won’t be easy, but that’s why we need you to join in and help.
I am sick of being ruled by traitorous scum, its time we the people rule again
I tried to copy the whole lot of the above and send it to my local MP but can’t get it to work. How can I send him a copy? Keith Pitt Bundaberg Qld.
Click in the article text anywhere and press CTRL-A. That will mark all the text. Then press CTRL-C to copy it. Then open your word processor new page and click in the blank page. Press CTRL-V to paste the article.
I hope more & more Australians will sign MY WILL AUSTRALIA lets get this COUNTRY back to where it should be
I am fearful of the future with Chinese takeovers and bitterly disappointed with all Political parties, especially the current one. I was foolishly hopeful we would see help for Farmers and Pensioners/the homeless. The help has to come from us. The Pollies get wealthy sitting on their hands.
We need revolution
jail the traitors
wow great to have all this info in one place..awesome guys
We want to be safe and be free
Time to take our country back and hold these criminals accountable for the damage they have done .
This goverment are corrupt and have sold us out how can they make the rules to protect them selves they have to answer to some one
THIS MASQUERADING GOVERNMENT….THESE IMPOSTER POLITICIANS MUST BE IN JAIL NOT OUR GOVERNMENT…
OUR TRUE AND LEGITIMATE CONSTITUTION MUST BE RE ESTABLISHED ALONG WITH OUR INHERENT RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ….DEMOCRACY IN AUSTRALIA IS AN ILLUSION
I do not consent to being subjected to the toxic harmful pollutants, warfare or experiments using EMFs, RFs, and Microwaves of any kind on myself, innocent children and others, my pets, wildlife, or the environment.
It is time to remove the unlawfull and corrupt turdcowmorrison and his unlawful corrupt Freemason corrupt government and politicians of Australia in the name of the
Commonweath of Australia Constitution.
Changes to the bail act 1982 link has been removed
I for 1 would like to choose weather or not I would stick a poisonous needle into my child or not and not be bribed by weather if I do I’m going to get paid by the government that is bull shit it’s playing a wild card with my child’s life if they react or if it’s going to cause my child disability or death that is bull shit ,, it’s not a free world and thats not even the start of it,,everything is a scam and everything is a lie,,I mean what exactly are we freely aloud to do all I feel is “can’t do this” “can’t do that” constantly,, and I know there would be anarcy if we didn’t have rules and regulations but ease up turbo there’s a better way to go about this and this corrupt government needs to end !!!!!
It will. Keep listening to the Battler:
https://thebloodyaussiebattler.com/
I’m livid about this. I’ll be signing my letter asap and have shared the hell out of this site on fb.
I want back all the money I’ve paid in fees and taxes!
I have become very confused lately. The Commonwealth constitution is said to be the highest law in the land yes? What if its time has passed and we were not told. Please bear with me.. On the 28/6/1919 Australia signed the treaty of Versailles. Only a sovereign independent country could sign the treaty. Direct quote from Australia the concealed colony. The problem lies in the fact that as a legal entity the Commonwealth of Australia owed it’s existence to an Act of parliament of the United Kingdom, namely,’An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia’ {UK} 1900.
On the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia ratifying the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on October 1, 1919 the Commonwealth of Australia achieved sovereign independent nation status thus separating itself from the Act of British law.. End quote. The new status immediately gained international recognition.
Also Clause 2 of preamble states the Queen shall be in the sovereignty of the united kingdom which means even today any laws passed must be done in sovereignty of UK under the Commonwealth Constitution. {This constitution was for a colony} Also means this constitution only has power to create Australian colonial subjects under immigration. No power to make Australian citizens/nationals.
It is my contention at this point Australia was in a similar position as the 1890’s before the constitution and that is still where we are today. We require a new referendum to fix this mess from inside and create a wholly Australian head of state. Like a directly voted president.
There are only about 3 countries in similar positions , Australia, Canada and New Zealand where the queen seems to be the head of state and laws are assented to through letters patent Excluding UK. Problem Queen can only give letters patent to UK subjects within territory of UK according to UK law.. So this would imply that no laws could be validly passed within the Commonwealth of Australia since around 1920. Of course with the passage of time this situation only gets worse for each treaty signed puts Australia and UK further apart in terms of sovereignty. Then of course there is the Act of Westminster and the Australia acts. Could you please tell me what am I missing if you still hold that the constitution is valid and highest authority in this land?
Other Commonwealth former colonies seem to have their own head of power and do not rely on the Queen in {any form} for royal assent to their legislation in order to make laws.
Yes, it can be confusing, but you can overcome it by reading more articles on this website and by listening to The Bloody Aussie Battler podcasts on YouTube.
I LOATHE theses politicians just do as they please. WE are told after their action is taken. If indeed we are told at all. MUST CHANGE.
Having read right through this document, I cannot see any solution, humanly speaking. As we are so very near the “Rapture” and thus only about 7 years from the conclusion of the Tribulation, the problem will disappear with the glorious coming of our Lord and Saviour. In view of this ‘time-table’ is it worth fighting for a righteous and legal solution?
What rubbish are you spouting? If this is the attitude of Christians you are all just part of the problem. When are you going to start THINKING?
Why is it that “We the People” of Australia cannot form a Class Action to force these corrupt governments to stand trial for Treason? I must be wearing rose colored glasses – we have all this evidence, we all know they have acted illegally – this question has been on my mind for a very long time.
Yvonne, a class action is heard under the corrupt political party corporate judicial system. That will never give us justice. But you may be very pleased to learn that a large group of Australians from around the country have united to organize Common Law Courts….which is what our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 is based on. We are very close to convening these Common Law Courts now, and when we do the people will get their own justice against the criminals, liars, thieves and TRAITORS.
May I make a suggestion?
You need to stop thinking that the government ruling us today has any authority to do so. They have betrayed us and our nation many times over. The work we are doing to bring in Common Law will completely change our nation. But the first step is for each one of us to change our own thinking.
This is the website we are currently developing. You can watch as it grows…and of course you will be able to get directly involved very soon.
https://commonlawcourtaus.org/
It’s Amazing, 60 minutes told us there were & are more FACTIONS doing this.
Maybe Dan Andrews FACTION was starting to get crushed by this FACTION and setting him Up.
SO he doesn’t LOSE CONTROL.
This is Why he Told his mates at 60 minutes & AGE, To go after him. SO he could stay in CONTROL & POWER until he got rid of this FACTION.
I’m a bit confused, because the letter you provide above by Attorney General McClelland does not say that the Australia Act does not stand, but only that the constitution does not recognise local government. It states that in the 1988 referendum, the motion to give constitutional recognition to local government was not carried. It does not mention that state and federal geovernments are not recognised by the constitution, nor does it mention the Auatralia Act at all. So, am I missing something here?
I have a court transcript here from the SA Supreme Court where the plaintiff has proved to the judge that the Australia Act does not stand, and the judge agreed. So we have proof. Don’t ask me to publish it. But I do know that the transcript is being passed around the internet.
I recently came across that case in SA … high court australia Document decisions cases past and new …. thoroughly interesting reading, and next thing you know there’s lots of astonishing reading of a similar same kind!
I can’t stop reading now …. Enjoy folks 👌🤞
Can you attach a link to it please, I have tried to find it on the net but can’t see it. Please link it.
A link to what?
Can you please attach a link to the place on the net to show that a plaintiff has proved to the judge that the Australia Act does not stand.
The link to download the Supreme Court decision is now available at the top of the page.
Mother fuckn corrupt bastards, we people need to educate ourselves & really know our rights 👍💪
I can only hope and pray that all Australians Wake Up and Stand Up and take heed of this hidden truth and Treason, Once And For All , The time has come (again) – Let’s make our intentions Clear this time.
Please teach your young ones The Australian Constitution basics at least, and they will be the future “top dog” who can govern in accordance with We The People.
I wish I’d taken more notice when I was younger that’s for sure!
Best of luck and luv to ya!
I wish I could do more.
OK! we have all the info now tell me simply, please, how do we unite to enact change ???
You can register to be a part of the Common Law Court system teams around Australia are currently setting up. Click here to:
Join the Common Law Court