Commonwealth of Australia Vs Australia Act

Commonwealth of Australia or not?

There is a lot of discussion about Australia’s status as a nation. According to the political parties the Australia Act severed Australia from government by the British Crown and established a separate and sovereign Australia.

But did it?

Any change to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 must be approved first by the People of the Commonwealth voting in a Referendums. 

The People of the Commonwealth never voted in a referendum to approve the Australia Act. In fact, to bring in such an Act would require three referendums. This did not happen. Therefore, all acts, laws and legislation enacted since that date are invalid. They have no authority.

When an Attorney-General says the Australia Act was not valid, the political party governments had better pay attention — because We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia are!

This also means that when We, the People of the Commonwealth, bring our government back into the Realm of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 we are going to have to re-examine every conviction for crimes, every eviction and possession of land, houses, and farms by the unlawful political party system to determine whether these were carried out lawfully.

In the case of people convicted of crimes and currently sitting in jail will have to have their cases reviewed to determine if they require a new lawful trial, as required by the Magna Carta and our Constitution.

In effect, the Australia Act has created a massive political and legal mess that needs to be cleaned up.

Commonwealth of Australia? Didn’t The Australia Act 1986 Sever That?

Australia-Act-preamble

In 1986 the Parliament voted in The Australia Act 1986, which is the short title of each of a pair of separate but related pieces of legislation: one an Act of the Commonwealth (i.e. federal) Parliament of Australia, the other an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. In Australia they are referred to, respectively, as the Australia Act 1986 (Cth) and the Australia Act 1986 (UK). These nearly identical Acts were passed by the two parliaments, because of uncertainty as to which of the two had the ultimate authority to do so. The Acts came into effect simultaneously.

They were worded:

An Act to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation.

They brought in this Act using Section 51 (xxxviii) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. The exercise within the Commonwealth, at the request or with the concurrence of the Parliaments of all the States directly concerned, of any power which can at the establishment of this Constitution be exercised only by the Parliament of the United Kingdom or by the Federal Council of Australasia.

This mysterious power confers on the Commonwealth, in cooperation with the States, the power to do anything for Australia which only the United Kingdom could do at the time of Federation.

Section 51 (xxxviii) actually reflects Australia’s colonial status in 1901, while lessening its effect by authorising Australians to do most things affecting Australia for themselves. However, this section is so ambiguous that both the British and Australian Parliaments were unsure who had the ultimate authority to change Australia’s legal status. That they acted without at least a referendum of We the People shows that they were acting unlawfully. Under Section 128, any change to the Constitution must be voted on by We the People voting in a referendum. The Australia Act sought to substantially change the status of our Constitution….in effect abrogating it in favour of a new Constitution written by the political parties colluding with each other.

They either ignored, or were not aware of Sections 61 to 68 of our Constitution.

The intent of The Australia Act (Cth and UK) was supposed to eliminate the remaining possibilities for the UK to legislate with effect in Australia, for the UK to be involved in Australian government, and for an appeal from any Australian court to a British court.

Section 61 to 68 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act UK 1900 and Section 61 to 68 of the Commonwealth Constitution 1900 establishes the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia not of Australia. These Sections ensure that our status as the Commonwealth of Australia cannot be changed, as we are and always have been since Federation part of the British Parliament and the Queen (Monarch).

The Prime Minister is the Foreman of the Legislature, part of the Federal Government. This is merely a matter of tradition, as the Constitution does not mention a Prime Minister, or the powers that should limit one. The PM has No Other Authority, Nor Any Say Between The People (Who Are The Commonwealth) and the Monarch. He is merely the leader of the political party that wins any election, and therefore he is automatically appointed Prime Minister by consent of the Political Party he leads.

commonwealth-coat-arms
The true Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms

The Governor General is the only and Highest Authority in government acting on behalf of the Crown, along with the Executive, and the GG is the only Authority mentioned in the Constitution.

For the Queen to sign the Australia Act the government is required to hold a referendum in England, and most probably the Empire, to get the permission of the Commonwealth to give away one of Her Realms, in this case the Continent of Australia.

That did not happen!

At the very least it would require permission from the House of Lords, the Keepers of Her Realms and then go to the British Parliament first.

Remember HM Queen Elizabeth II is only the Monarch of the Empire, not the owner.

If the Australia Act got past those hurdles it would then have to go to The People of the Commonwealth of Australia for approval by referendum vote. It did not!

That Referendum would have to come from The People to the Governor General for permission to remove the Constitution, but this cannot happen because the union between Great Britain and Australia is indisolvable. The first eight sections of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 are an Act of the British Parliament and cannot be changed.

The People are the Commonwealth NOT the Government

The People are the States NOT the Government.

It is the Crown in Right of The Commonwealth, not the government.

The Crown is bound by the Constitution which is Quasi Sovereign and The Will of The People.

The Queen is the currently reigning Monarch and is bound by the Constitution under the authority of the Crown – She is not the Crown.

Our Forefathers and the Framers of Our Constitution were too smart for the liars that have sat in Our Parliament since 1919 when PM Billy Hughes, an ALP man, tried to sever our Commonwealth Status and start us on the road to becoming a Republic by enrolling Australia as a Founding Member of the League of Nations – the forerunner to the United Nations.

TIME TO WAKE UP THE TRAITORS

The following explains in detail why the Australia Act is Unconstitutional, Invalid, and Null & Void. It states:

An Act to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and Federal nation.

WHEREAS the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth and the Premiers of the States at conferences held in Canberra on 24 and 25 June 1982 and 21 June 1984 agreed on the taking of certain measures to bring “constitutional arrangements” affecting the Commonwealth and the States into “conformity” with the “status” of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation:

“constitutional arrangements” = Australia Law as a private company

“conformity” means that the Commonwealth is already a private Company. We the people never voted for this in a referendum =TREASON

To have the “status” “sovereign, independent and federal nation” that means Republican Dictatorship.

Notice: sovereign, independent and federal nation are NOT Sovereign, Independent and Federal Nation. We are NOT yet a Republic.

The Australia Act 1986 Proclamation signed by Bob Hawk with only his printed name is not a legal signature.

All States created an Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was void as the so-called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.

This proves that all State so called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON

Entrenched sections within these Acts are:

Referendum No 1 We are a Constitutional Monarchy NOT a sovereign, independent and federal nation. = TREASON

Referendum No 2 Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 is Referendum entrenched and stipulates

Queensland’s Constitution Act 1867

53.(1) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act namely—

sections 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and this section 53 shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act. = TREASON

Referendum No 3 Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 is Referendum entrenched and stipulates Western Australia Constitution Act 1889 Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions 73(2)

A Bill that

  1. expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or
  2. expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or
  3. expressly or impliedly provides that the Legislative Council or the Legislative Assembly shall be composed of members other than members chosen directly by the people;or
  4. expressly or impliedly provides for a reduction in the numbers of the members of the Legislative Council or of the Legislative Assembly; or
  5. expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless
  6. the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and
  7. the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.

= TREASON

WITHOUT these THREE REFERENDUMS taking place ALL Australia Acts are VOID AND SHALL BE OF NO EFFECT AS AN ACT

Therefore all so-called Acts from that date forward are only PURPORTED ACTS and PURPORTED ENACTMENTS = TREASON

The Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia, as registered with the Brigalow Corporation. The Queen of Australia is merely a name on the company registration of the Brigalow Corporation. She is not a real person. = TREASON

The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

THEY ARE TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS

Political Parties their Religious mates, the Judiciary and their Professors or Law are GUILTY OF TREASON, TREACHERY, AND SABOTAGE of our once-great Commonwealth of Australia.


(If you want to do something to stop the criminal corporate political parties continuing to destroy our nation and our Democracy, sign up for free at Advance Australia Group. We are not a political party. We are a political group of Australians who want to bring back the rule of law under our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901….Click here to Sign Up!)


We support BRIGHTEON VIDEO as a much better alternative to YouTube. Have you tried Brighteon yet?

brighteon-logo


~ Information supplied by Wayne Glew

Summary of the Australia Act – by Dick Yardley

The Australia Acts 1985 1986

Proclamation signed, Bob Hawk — this is not a legal signature.

The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 done by all States was void as the so called Act needed 3 Entrenched Referendums just to become an Act.

This proves that all State so-called Governors sold their souls to the Political Parties = TREASON

The three Entrenched Referendums are:

No 1  We are a Constitutional Monarchy, The Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 was for a sovereign, independent federal nation. To become a sovereign independent nation we had to vote the Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Defender of the Faith, out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. NO REFERENDUM = TREASON

No 2  Section 13 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.

13 Amendment of Constitution Act of Queensland

(1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in this section referred to as the Principal Act.

The sections within this Section 13 are referendum entrenched

” Requirement For Referendum

  1. Certain measures to be supported by referendum.

(l) A Bill that expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor or that expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act

namely- .sections

1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14 and

this section 53

shall not be presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen unless it has first been approved by the electors in accordance with this section and a Bill so assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.  NO REFERENDUM = TREASON

No 3  Section 14 of the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985.

14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia

(1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in this section referred to as the Principal Act. 

Legislature as constituted by this Act empowered to alter any of its provisions

73

(2) A Bill that

(a) expressly or impliedly provides for the abolition of or alteration in the office of Governor; or

(e) expressly or impliedly in any way affects any of the following sections of this Act, namely sections 2, 3, 4, 50, 51, and 73, shall not be presented for

assent by or in the name of the Queen unless

(f) the second and third readings of the Bill shall have been passed with the concurrence of an absolute majority of the whole number of the members

for the time being of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly, respectively; and

(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section, and a Bill assented to consequent upon its

presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.NO REFERENDUM = TREASON

The Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 Act No. 143 of 1985 was after

The  Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 How come the Australia Act came before the Australia (Request and Consent) Act.

The  Australia Act 1986 No. 142, 1985 was enacted to the Queen of Australia and under the Political Parties Definition of Australia = TREASON

The Australia Act 1986 UK was enacted under the Definition of The Commonwealth of Australia as established under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT ACTS

Political Parties their Religious Anglican Church mates, their JUDICIARY and their Professors of LAW are TREASONOUS BASTARDS.

People of the Commonwealth of Australia under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 voted to stay as a Constitutional Monarchy in 1999.

By NOT listening to the People the Political Parties in the State and Federal Governments, their Parliaments kept the TREASON going by using the Australia Act 1986 Act 142 as their Primary Law

The Question

What do we do about all Australian Political Parties using the Australia Acts = TREASON removing all OUR Rights?

 


 

REMOVAL OF THE CROWN

Read, save, share.

2003 the Parliament removed the Crown and replaced it with State using the Acts Amendments and Repeal (Courts and Legal Practice) Act 2003 (WA) s Amendments about the Crown, (without referendum)
121. Bail Act 1982 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s121.html
122. Children’s Court of Western Australia Act 1988 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s122.html
123. The Criminal Code amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s123.html
124. Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1991 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s124.html
125. District Court of Western Australia Act 1969 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s125.html
126. Family Court Act 1997 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s126.html
127. Juries Act 1957 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s127.html
128. Justices Act 1902 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s128.html
129. Local Courts Act 1904 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s129.html
130. Supreme Court Act 1935 amended
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/aaaralpa200365o20…/s130.html
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/…/num…/aaaralpa200365o2003458/

Criminal Code Compilation Act 1913

PART II.–OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER.

CHAPTER VI.—TREASON AND OTHER OFFENCES AGAINST THE SOVEREIGN’S PERSON AND AUTHORITY.
See s37-39 on scans pictured.

They cannot repeal this Act as its created by UK. (See Attached)
UCC 1-30 all rights reserved without prejudice.
Hansard files
Extract from Hansard
[ASSEMBLY – Tuesday, 25 February 2003]
p4601b-4609a
Ms Sue Walker; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr Jim McGinty
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/f724a3629f0cfcfbc8257570007f4238/$FILE/A36%20S2%2020030225%20p4601b-4609a.pdf

Extract from Hansard

[ASSEMBLY – Thursday, 4 December 2003]
p14291b-14292a
Mr Jim McGinty
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/5ac7243c307177f7c8257570007fdb19/$FILE/A36%20S2%2020031204%20p14291b-14292a.pdf

Extract from Hansard

[ASSEMBLY – Tuesday, 16 December 2003]
p14906c-14922a
Speaker; Mr John Kobelke; Mr Max Trenorden; Mr Rob Johnson; Mr Phillip Pendal; Mr Colin Barnett; Dr Janet
Woollard; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr Jim McGinty; Mr John Bradshaw
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard/hansard.nsf/0/466beaf725f47dbec8257570007fe223/$FILE/A36+S2+20031216+p14906c-14922a.pdf

Extract from Hansard

[COUNCIL – Wednesday, 25 June 2003]
p9159b-9159b
Hon Nick Griffiths
http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Hansard%5Chansard.nsf/0/9bdebf1cab5831acc825757000800dde/$FILE/C36%20S2%2020030625%20p9159b-9159b.pdf

——————————————————–

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 thoughts on “Commonwealth of Australia Vs Australia Act”