In 1974 and 1988 Australians voted in referendums that asked if we would like to approve Local Government.
There was a resounding NO to both referendums.
To circumvent the Will of the People, State Governments brought in state Acts authorizing local councils as a third tier of government.
They completely ignored the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, Section 109 that states… When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
When we the People of the Commonwealth of Australia vote in a referendum the result is Constitutional Law. This means that any State law that is inconsistent with it is Null and Void…it has no authority, no power. It cannot be.
It is that simple.
This means that Local Councils are just that….LOCAL COUNCILS. They are not and cannot be a third tier of government. Nor can they levy taxes, no matter how they disguise these taxes with words like ‘council rates’, ‘land rates’, or even ‘administration charges’. They cannot levy taxes….no if’s, and’s, or but’s.
It is up to each member of the Commonwealth of Australia, that’s you and me, to stand up to these unlawful State governments and their little dog local councils and say NO! I will not pay your unlawful Rate or Parking Fines, or Animal Registration Fees.
These and all the other “fees” they charge, have no basis in law…. they are all inconsistent with Commonwealth Law.
When you are hauled into court, as you surely will be when dealing with these unlawful criminals, this article by an English bloke explains how you can stand in honour in court as a MAN and refuse to acknowledge their attempt to turn you into a corporate body they can take money from.
Read this article several times. Comprehend it, and use the arguments it teaches to put the judge, magistrate and local council right where they belong. In the wrong!
We, the People of the Commonwealth have a right and a duty to Lawfully Rebel. Read Article 61 in the Magna Carta, which states we must never bow down to bullies, criminals, and traitors!
Questions for the Court:
If you have been hauled into court over a fine or other breech of THEIR legislation (not our laws), then you only have to ask two questions of the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff is the person who has brought you before the court. The Plaintiff is NOT the judge or magistrate. You must ask these questions of your accuser.
If they cannot prove their authority you can immediately ask the judge or magistrate to dismiss the case.
Q1. Please show that the Subject matter jurisdiction is applicable to a subject of Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth
Q2. Has the plaintiff brought the subject matter jurisdiction into a court that has authority over a subject of Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth?
155 thoughts on “Councils have no Authority to charge Rates”
If we are talkig of documents with a strawman, Word Art, Glossa, ASL, DOG LATIN or whatever does that not also bring into question books articles printed in Glossa such as some bibles even the constitution?
Correct I feel Richard , for I concur…
I’d would really like to know how to go about how to go about this, if it comes to going court. The town I’m living in isn’t happy paying rates, nor are they happy with the council anyway. Would I require a lawyer etc.
Lawyers are part of the problem… they are in the unlawful system.
Learn about Common Law. Listen to The Bloody Aussie Battler Podcast
It appears that you are forgetting that your house, car and everything else registered to “MR ROGER HAYES” is what the Council will be attempting to sue for. You actually don’t own any of those assets, “MR ROGER HAYES” does, so you have managed to prove that you are separate to “MR ROGER HAYES”, however i’m not sure how you’d go proving that “MR ROGER HAYES” is constitutionally protected against illegal local government. Unfortunately we’ve already been signed up to the trap and it’s not until we realise we’re in it, that we then comprehend that our entire lives revolve around the trap…
If you look at the rates notice it is to the land owner, If you look at the title you are a land holder not the land owner.
That is correct, and my understanding is that we own the house and not the land.
On my title deeds next to my name is tenant . My son who is also on the deeds has tenant next to his name
Registering your property etc., on the P.P.S.R. could help. At least you would have first dibs at any taking of these goods from you, so once the council or whoever, tries to take things away from you, they may not bother, as you are “First in line, first in time”.
What’s the PPSR please? Is this only in UK?
Hi.
If THEY can prove you are a PERSON, “FICTIONAL CORPORATION”, they can charge you but, how can they if your a flesh and blood being.
I am 66 years old. I was born & bred under the clouds of pollution from the BHP in Newcastle. If any man wanted a job anytime, they could go to BHP, Stuart’s & Lloyd’s,Goninans and they could pick up labouring jobs. BHP also trained hundreds, if not thousands, of apprentices in every field associated with steel making or mining. Then the educated, unethical high flyers came in to disembowel the whole lot to make quick $$$ with no thought to the future. All our manufacturing went away, retail giants moved in, small businesses shut down, family businesses bankrupted, unemployment rose……..and now 30+ years later we own nothing!! China owns more of our productive land than we do, most of our expensive real estate in the capital cities, shoddily built high rises in Sydney are just the tip of the iceberg. Our politicians have sold the water from our rivers that were the life blood of our farmers, leaving them with nothing but pain & heartache & abject misery…….this is TREASON‼️‼️‼️‼️
This year I didn’t celebrate Australia Day….I’m ashamed to be associated with our government & their blatant anti-Australian policies. And it’s not just the Libs & the Nats, it’s LABOR as well. The Greens play tit for tat, useless.
I’m just sick of it. On top of the fires and the mass annihilation of our beautiful wild life, we now no legacy for our children. Apocalypse much❓❓❓❓
I was 2 years in Poland Rub small Bussiness and i preffer live in Australia 100% times than in past Socialist country with the biurokratic rules like never before ..
Sadly very true
It was probably part of the orchestration of the international mobs agenda of controlling all the production in the world.
Since when have referendums been legally binding for the federal govt?
Never…
If we have a lawful government under the Constitution they would be bound by the Constitution. But when we are ruled over by a bunch of liars, thieves and traitors we can’t expect truth, honesty or honour.
That is true a failed referendum does not change anything. The problem is when the Hawk Government then went to all the States and had them recognise local government at State level without reference to the people, (State Constitutions are just an act of parliament and can be changed by who ever is in power at the time) They in fact circumvented the express will of the Nation and the States who said no at the referendum. This was an act of treachery on behalf of the public sector union and the local government lobby. The fact remains that the details that were asked for in the 1988 referendum remain as unconstitutional yet the States enacted almost the exact same wording in the State Constitutions in order to maintain these fundamentally unlawful local governments. The State recognition of local government in State Constitutions was against the express will of the Australian people who said no when they were asked at referenda. The State governments had no mandate to do it, it was simply a deliberate circumvention of the peoples express will via a flaw in the system of Federation.
Hi Bruce, your first sentence: “That is true a failed referendum does not change anything.” Is not true, and misses the point.
The referendum did not “fail”, as we successfully got a majority saying NO to the third government structure. The failure is, we-the-people not taking the government to account at the time for not carrying on with the majority vote. This would have woken up a lot of people of the criminal actions of the politicians failing to do their duty. Failure of duty = breach of contract, and hence, a sackable offence. I concur with your other comments. Cheers JM.
Wasn’t it Whitlam who took the Constitution back to the Queen so we in Australia don’t actually have a Constitution?
He didn’t take it back to the Queen. He amended the Royal Style and Titles Act and deleted the Crown, and then created a new Queen of Australia and registered it to the private corporation registered in the USA.
Sue, you can thank Whitlam for destroying small business and our manufacturing and giving everything over to the Chinese, the Lima agreement sealed our fate and yes I worked in times when there were plenty of jobs, the BHP was what made Newcastle the place it used to be, sadly it died when the BHP also died!!
Well said Sue, we need to remember it was never the government’s to sell and more fool the receivers of stolen property. Our councils are run by the UN now so time we got rid of them and at least the money saved on rates ECT could go back to our local communities not some fat cats wallet.
I agree 100% and feel exactly the same. The Government is guilty of gross negligence and mismanagement. To call them traitorous is an understatement. They have grossly failed their constituents and should be held accountable. The system is not only broken but outdated and needs to be overhauled. Two party preferred system just is not working.
Totally agree, as many australians would. the blatant corruption and incompetence has gone too far. The only thing both parties have done well is decimate our industry and agriculture, then have the hide to blame the unemployed for not getting a job!
A proper anti corruption agency with the power to jail and strip assets is the only answer, but what politician would vote for that idea?
We have to stop giving these politicians any power. The only way, right now, to do that is to deny them your vote. If everyone withheld their vote they couldn’t get elected and we would then be able to start afresh. But there is another solution: Common Law. Go to this website and read up about it, learn how each one of us can start acting to take back control over the government. commonlaw.earth
Totally.agree with that idea of jail & asset stripping of the treasonous individuals involved
Vincent
No a lair will not defend you proper as they belong to The Bar and their first duty is to them We (people ) rate about 3rd from memory
If your planning mounting a constitutional challenge…yes, hire a lawyer …
Hahaha! Seriously? I hope that was tongue-in-cheek.
Vicente, buy a Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and it is all written in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act .
You are still forced to pay parking tickets
Yawhol Mein Herr…. because you are stupid enough to bow down like a good little Hitler Youth.
my council fined me for long grass whilst i was away i didnt pay the fine next thing the council contacted the licencing centre and cancelled my licence so i had to pay it was not happy
Put this down in an Affidavit and send it to us so you can testify before the Grand Jury.
https://mywillaustralia.com/my-affidavit-to-the-grand-jury/
Any idea where this website has gone
We shut down MyWillAustralia because the author got arrested and thrown in jail, not because of the My Will letters, but for something else. So, we set these up instead:
https://crimwatch.earth/
and
https://commonlaw.earth/index.php/courts/petitions-and-letters
Isnt that being bullied ???
Agree whole heartedly. Queeenland has enacted the becarra legislation which will give CEOs of Councils the right to dispose of our assets,contract out services for the benefit of whoever is in power in short, act however the mood takes them. How do we organise a revolt against this legalized thievery ? Thoughts ?? Amyone ??
Yes, we all have to learn about Common Law first… but we can also help bring it about by downloading and signing the My Will Letter, and getting as many others to do the same. Make sure you mail the signed letters to the address in the website.
Set up meetings in your area to discuss the Constitution, Common Law and other community issues. Once we start these meetings I will help you move them towards establishing Common Law courts, councils and even government of the people. We have to move step by step, but the first step is to decide you will do something. If you would like to set up a meeting contact me through this website and I’ll send you detailed instructions on setting up a group.
This link doesn’t exist it’s 403 error
What link? Be precise.
Gee, if anyone does have the answer then there will be a lot of followers to help out. But what & how ????
You have the answer. You just need to learn what your rights are and stand up for them. Keep reading articles on this website, join our Facebook page cirnowaustralia, and contact me if you are ready to start a group in your area to learn about Common Law, the Constitution and our rights.
I see there is no point in having a Revolution, best we all stay at home and stop feeding the beast.
A Revolution doesn’t work and you can be peppered, electrocuted or jailed as free speech is not free…..
I’m sure you are not serious, but if you are….with an attitude like that you deserve to be a sheep. Baaaaah!
Revolution sounds good to me but ppl in this country will never stand togethor because the government made sure of it years ago. Over immigration. As long as were pointing the finger n hating on each other we never gonna stand togethor, simple.
Wanna bet? The People just don’t know they have the power yet. But keep watching this website and listening to our Battler podcasts. Lots more useful information is on the way.
Mass non compliance is the only way!!!
Is there a court reference to your case/s that we can quote
Ie: hayes v council day/month/date ?
I don’t have anything in my hand, although I do know people have won against the councils. But others have lost badly too. However, if we all stand together we can put a stop to the crimes and treason. Read my response to Trevor Hughes and decide if you are ready to act.
That is fraudulent tactics between the GVT AND THE COUNCILS OF AUSTRALIA I AM AGAINST THE COUNCILS AND GVTS STEALING UNLAWFULLY FROM THE PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA!
Bob Hawke put up a trick question as the Federal Government hasn’t existed since 1973 when Rt Hon. Ted Heath Disenfranchised Australians in Both Hoouses of Westminster
Not if you take then to court .. I’ve win more than I’ve lost ..
Would love to hear your tactics. Please contact me through our Contact Us page.
Love your work
The 1974 referendum was asking: An Act to alter the Constitution to enable the Commonwealth to borrow money for, and to grant financial assistance to, local government bodies. Nothing about recognition of authority. Might want to get your research skills checked out.
It was a sideways attempt to get us to authorize local government. You might want to open your eyes a bit wider and look at the bigger picture.
Haha. Burn. You’re cooked, mate. Don’t let your emotions get in the way of facts.
Yada, yada, yada. Pratt, you are an idiot.
It’s been tried and people have lost their homes.for not paying rates in Australia, after going to the high court even. You can say this easily but it is not true,as per rulings in court. .so in case you missed it homes have been lost for simply not paying rates
That’s because they have been fighting in the wrong jurisdiction. That’s why we are in the process of setting common law courts in Australia. Keep watching my podcasts to learn more:
https://youtu.be/xCk9eUUGvc4
Correct!!
Then, why ask the people in a referendum to recognition local government ?
Question
A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to recognise local government.
1988 Australian referendum (Local Government)
The Constitution Alteration (Local Government) Bill 1988,[1] was an unsuccessful proposal to alter the Australian Constitution to recognise local government. It was put to voters for approval in a referendum held on 3 September 1988. The structure of the Constitution recognises government at federal and state levels, but makes no mention of local government.
The “no” campaign in 1988 argued that this change would undermine states’ rights, i.e. that it would move – or make it possible to move – some power from state governments to local governments.
Despite 2 referendums, the politicians unilaterally decided to go ahead and make councils a 3rd tier of government. Ask them if they are a business using an ABN why are they acting as a government? They can’t be both.
When and where did this case take place so everyone can reference it as precedent!?
Read the newspaper report at the end of the page. It was in England, but their laws affect us too. As you read you will see how the chap dealt with the judge. That is what he you need to learn.
WHAT ABOUT CLASS ACTION AUSTRALIA WIDE AGAINST RATES????
We don’t need a Class Action. Go and watch the YouTube Videos by William Bero.
go into utube, payment, non paymentof fines, rates , i think there is a publication out there $25, i think
Is this the book you are referring to?
Steps to Fight Fines and Stay out of Court
Ive mentioned this to many people, but they fear authority and won’t help themselves.
Show them this book. We all need to understand that there are 2 law systems in place today…our Common Law, the Supreme Law of the Constitution, and their fake Admiralty or Commercial Law under the UN and UCC
A Common Law Training Manual
We all need to overcome our fear That is what the criminals feed on.
All Australians need to read the constitution of AUSTRALIA
You can download if FREE right here. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900
The Constitution of Australia is an act of the British parlaiment at Westminster. It has never been ratified by the parlaiment of The commonwealth of Australia. which it was told to do after Australia became a soverign country by the fact that it was permitted to sit at the negotiating table at the Treaty of Versailles hosted by the League of Nations. The rules of the league was that no nation that was not soverign would be permitted to sit at the table. Britain permitted Australia and the other dominions of the commonwealth to sit at the table . Thereby changeing us from a colony to a full soverign nation , with all the powers of such, providing our prime minister Billy Hughes went home and ratified the British bill in the australian parlaiment. He balked at doing this for fear of losing another referenda (he lost two previously on conscription) Since this constitution has never been ratified in Australia. ALL LAWS, TAXES, AND PENALTIES ARE ILLEGAL. God help Australia.
You are partly right. The Australian People did vote for the Constitution BEFORE it was sent to Queen Vic for her signature.
But you are right about the Treaty of Versailles and League of Nations. However, your conclusions that the constitution was never ratified is wrong. I’m not going to debate this here. Please read the information on this website and learn what has really happened.
I would like to see a group form a committee to take this further & get it past that NO ONE need to pay any means of rates again. ASAP.
If you are ready to form a group in your area use our Contact form and I will help you get organized.
I’m curious about caveats that may be on your property imposed by a council for the payment of a bill, as they paid for cleaning of my premises after it was cleaned after police located a “meth lab”.
Great information thank you. We are all over this in central Queensland. We the people here in Rockhampton have established a Common Law Court. Things are moving along well with members well aware of their treasonous way. Stay tuned.
Good on you all. That makes Rockhampton one of the very few places in Australia that has a chance of a fair deal.
Yes And what is any one going to do about it ?
The question is… what are YOU doing about it? Have you read the Constitution? Do you know what Common Law is and how it works? Have you started to Lawfully Rebel?
Under Common Law and our Constitution it is everyone’s duty to fix a problem they see with the government.
this is a very interesting article, I am trying to work out currently if indeed the formation of the Family Law Act is legal and the very distinctive bias it holds against males, whether they be defacto, married . That Act has been constructed to strip assets from families to the benefit of lawyers and the female applicant. Yet nobody seems to be able to act on this matter, the Family Law Court in Australia has more power than a criminal court for some reason. I think it is high time we as a nation took a very close look at many of the laws that are detrimental to society and the community but also to humanity as a whole
Great work keep it up
You have my support 100 percent
Our Council are making fools of our Community with their bullying ways. They keep making thier own laws and fines. Will not tell the Community where the money has gone from the sales of Ramsey Village and Nerrilda Nursing Home. They are also running Wadlata Out back Centre at a $500,00 loss, also every year the Arid Lands Gardens are losing the same amount every year. Something needs to be done as the Community are getting sick of being bullied
i especially love council replies, alerting me to such and such act, then signing off with such and such management team. My reply is mostly always the same – 1. Since There is no “I” in team, and in order for me to contract I will need 2. a wet ink signature from whomever it is who has apparent ruler ship over me, because 3. as it stands I cannot recognise council under my constitution. I never get a name and usually whatever BS pond scum fine gets revoked. Lately, in order to get some action, I’ve taken to asking Whom it is I need to file my notice of liability on, as my council has a nasty little policy of hanging up on me when I mention the constitution!! I cant believe how much that seems to make their verbal excrement head to their southern orifice!! Lol State revenue office and body Corp next – they say life is short but how long is a piece of political spin, I mean string! Sheesh
Especially when we are charged rates for no services, in many cases no access and then additional charges to camp (virtually rent) our own property. NICE!!!!!!!!
This whole system is corrupt, I have a big bee up my arse, please send this to my email, I want to know more please, please feed me the knowledge,I’m fighting with council now over thier bullshit, I have always said that they are a scam,I have not paid rates for a while as they do fucking nothing, they are theives
You can download this article and use it… you can also get all the letters and information you need to challenge councils here:
https://advance-australia.com.au/product/steps-to-fight-fines/
Well……Join me in a class action against the state of queensland if you want to help with signitures….I will do the rest
Sending people out to fight the Councils one by one is irresponsible, the little people just get trashed. – running out on a crusade will leave you with no home, much stress, and no solution.!
Come up with a real solution to the problem. – and dont discuss it on a public forum.
I’ll have a cuppa with anyone anywhere that wants to talk commonsense – minus the BS –
Cheers – Jack Wood
So who are you? John Jones or Jack Wood? Frankly, I can’t see what you are offering. Come up with a tried and true method to take down the councils and I’ll listen. Otherwise, you sound like just another fake account to me.
The only thing is that these councils bully people I have repeatedly asked for bushland at the rear of my house to be cleared to a responsible distance but to no avail, so yes what do we pay them for. We the people are ignored.
UNDERSTAND THEY ARE A COMPANY THEY DONT REPRESENT YOU THEY AND YOUR GOVERNMENT DO NOT EVEN HAVE TO RECOGNIZE YOU, YOU AREN.T IN THEIR COMPANY CONSTITUTION THE AUSTRALIA ACT .RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION 1901 BE ACTIVE SPEAK TO YOUR FRIENDS READ THIS SITE THERE SOMETHING AFOOT AS WE SPEAK GOOD LUCK
I would humbly suggest that if you stood before the High Court and argued Clause 61 of the Magna carta prohibited in any way the formation of Local councils, that you would be laughed at. It is a clause that permits the governance by Barons – Local council perform almost all the functions that a Barony might. The clause, I would suggest, is supporting the rights of councils. What you DO have with local councils, is the right to sue them over grievance. They are NOT under the protection of law like State and Federal members.
Suggest all you like, but you have not comprehended the state of the law, or the results of two referendums in your supposition.
For someone who claims to know the Constitution, you truly don’t. Section 51 provides for exclusive, residual, and concurrent rights between the Commonwealth and the States. Local government and its development and regulation resides purely with the States. As such, Local Government, being the domain of the States, are an accepted level of government. Indeed in some states, local government pre-dates the Federal Government. You also need to keep in mind that the Federal government exists because the independent states agreed to form the Commonwealth.
You are also incorrect in saying referendums create law. What they do is tell the government the will of the people. If a referendum is won, then the government is empowered to change the Constitution – as this is the only way the Constitution in Australia can be amended. But, referendums are law, or legislation. To say it is demonstrates a poor knowledge of the very things you claim to know a lot a about.
As to the law in society, we have Common Law–developed and introduced after Britain was conquered by the Normans in 1066– and taken to all British colonies including us. We also have Statute Law, which is law made by parliament. It is accepted worldwide that Statute Law overrides Common Law as Statute Law is often the most current and generally reflects the will of the people at a particular time.
The Magna Carta, while a guiding document, does not really hold much weight anymore.
EDIT to my comment.
Instead of “But, referendums are law, or legislation” It should read: “But, referendums are not law, or legislation.”
It doesn’t matter what you wrote. You are still wrong.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I’ve heard this argument before. BUT you are forgetting one very important thing: Two things in fact, the 1974 and 1988 referendums.
In 1974 we, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia were asked to vote on a Proposed law entitled “An Act to alter the Constitution to enable the Commonwealth to borrow money for, and to grant financial assistance to, local government bodies”. — We voted a resounding No, because we knew that this was a prelude to make local councils a 3rd tier of government.
In 1988 we voted NO to a proposal to a Constitutional Alteration (Local Government) “to alter the constitution so as to recognise local government.”
Section 109 of the Constitution states “When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.”. This means that any state law that is inconsistent with the Constitution, and that includes Constitutional referendums, is null and void. So your argument is wrong. You have tried to make this case before and failed. So I suggest you actually read the constitution. the Crimes Act 1914, and Common Law so that you comprehend what you are talking about.
Your statement that the Constitution doesn’t hold water any more is laughably ludicrous. It is the very BASIS of our law in Australia. The only problem is that there are fools like you who would like to get rid of it, not realizing that the first 8 sections are a British Parliament Act of law and can never be changed except with the express permission of a majority of Australians voting for it… and if you thought Brexit was difficult you just try and take the Queen out of the Constitution, as Gough WHitlem did. That little act of TREASON is now coming back to bite the arses of the political parties big time. So you “wishing” for the removal of the constitution is just that… a wish. Do you believe the fairy tales too?
While it is true that a failed referendum changes nothing. The fact remains that there is no constitutional recognition of local government as a level of government in Australia. Councils are purely a creature of the States. In 1988 the Australian people said no to this proposed new section (119A) in the Australian Constitution. “Each State shall provide for the establishment and continuance of a system of local government, with local government bodies elected in accordance with the laws of the State and empowered to administer, and make by-laws, for their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the State.” The express will of the Australian people was and remains NO.
After the failed referendum the Hawk Government then asked the States to recognise local government in the the State Constitutions. This was done specifically to circumvent the express will of the Australian people and the people of the States who had just said no. It was an act of treason there was no referendum in the States. State Constitutions can be changed by an act of parliament and no State had a mandate to do it. So where do local governments get the power to administer and make bylaws now, when it was obviously necessary to be included in the referendum changes back in 1988? The fact is the express will of the people has been circumvented via a weakness in the structure of the Federation and it was done for the benefit of the public sector unions and the local government lobby. So referenda of this kind are only respected when the bureaucracy gets what it wants but circumvented when the people say no what kind of democracy is that? This loop hole constitutional or not needs to be closed. Constitutionally a Federal law is superior to State law should a conflict arise and this must also be applied to Federal Referenda. So councils have no legitimacy as a level of government there is only Federal and State government, in Australia councils are just an agency of the States and their power to make administer and make bylaws is very questionable when it is against the expres will of the Australian people.
When are we going to march, in anger, on all parliament houses and put the fear of death into the hearts of all traitor fraud “politicians “? We just need a date – Australia Day, ANZAC Day, 9/11 day, Port Arthur mass murder day, Lima Declaration Day, !988 Sellout Day ? There’s plenty to choose from. We want all dinkydi Aussies, the CFMEU, the Fireys, the betrayed servicemen, the Unionists ( what’s left of them ), the wide awake, the real Christians, the free thinkers, the athiests, the real patriots and all good left out Australians in the massed marches. Reinstate the Constitution and invalidate all the treasonous fake laws. Just let’s organize a date.
When you march you put your power into the hands of the very criminals who have harmed us and our nation. We cannot win when we play by their rules. They just laugh at us, knowing they will never do anything to help us.
Instead, we must step out of their jurisdiction and into Common Law under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution. We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia are sovereign. Only we have the power to change things…and it is the duty of each man and woman to work with our fellow man to right the many wrongs the political party criminals and their judiciary have inflicted on us.
This is why Advance Australia (CIRNOW) is preparing to convene a Grand Jury in Queensland to start hearing evidence so that we can issue Indictments against the criminals and traitors.
If you want to do your bit and help make Australia the wonderful country it once was, join us. Become a member… https://advance-australia.com.au/member-registration/, and help us gather as many signatures on the My Will letter as possible. The sooner we have hundreds of thousands of Australians demanding justice with us under Common Law the sooner we can take back our government:
https://mywillaustralia.com/
Please tell me if I’m in the right or in the wrong ..
Local council have ordered Port Neill to connect to mains waste water
even though we have our own septic systems .
They elected a contractor to do the work
and charge each and every house holder to comply with their demands.
They are charging big bucks,
and they have told us they have the right to walk in without an invite to do the job.
I have been told they will enforce a caveat .
Please explain
Nothing to explain. Just the criminals using standover tactics to get their way.
l have a problem with the water Authority in Drouin the charge me for water & swerage even though it’s not connected to my property
Then I hope this article has helped you understand how to deal with them. You might also find the template documents accompanying our e-Book very useful. They will guide you in how to word your objections to them.
https://advance-australia.com.au/product/steps-to-fight-fines/
This has occured because in 1972 the queen of England was (unlawfully) removed.and replaced with the (fake) queen of Australia. Then the UN took control (including unidroid treaty). And the UN now taxes charged and creates what ever law it wants. ATO is a 3rd party debt collection agency for the UN. We can only support and pray the Great Australian Party will fix these issues as they have served papers to England in the house of Lords.
It was actually 1973, but the rest of your statement is correct.
Does this apply in Canada ???????? as well?
Yes. Get Kevin Annett’s book and support a fellow Canadian.
https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/product/1544239610/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
That are greedy humans Absolutely disgusting
I have heard of this before some where, just can’t remember when . Anyway it’s dreadful,and they should be taken to task. Even in the bible Jesus overturned the tables of the greedy tax collectors,he even recognised that it was wrong back then what was being done to the people,and they’re still at it
Jesus overturned the tables of traders in the temple. His complaint…” you have turned my Father’s house into a den of robbers”. Tax collectors aren’t mentioned, however ‘money exchangers’ (bankers), among others who were selling animals for sacrifice to false gods are. Elsewhere, Jesus is quoted as saying, “render unto (give to) Ceasar what belongs (is owed) to him.” He said this so that those who lived under Ceasar’s (government) rule might have a peaceful life. This was collected by the tax collectors who were despised even in those days thousands of years ago.
We should enforce this
Everyone should Spread the word. Help others learn the truth….then we can all act as a united Commonwealth of Australia.
BHP. Went offshore,it didn’t die.
No, BHP didn’t die, but by going offshore all the jobs for us Aussies went too. Do you comprehend the problem now?
I share many of the comments being a Novocastrian as being true.the currant and recent situations affecting many areas in our country deserves many questions ; which I’m sure thinking people have.the big question is ” who will answer with social justice ” to all
DEAR SUE YOU AND I ARE OF A SIMILAR AGE GROUP AND I MYSELF AM BROKEN HEARTED AS I SLIDE DOWN THE SLOPE TO A HOPEFULLY BLISSFUL OBLIVION .YEARS AGO WHILE MY WIFE WAS SHOPPING I WOULD GO TO THE LIBRARY AND READ WITH PRIDE MAGAZINES SUCH AS OVERSEAS TRADING A MAGAZINE ABOUT AUSSIE COMPANIES AND THEIR EXPORTS.OVER THE YEARS THEY KEPT CHANGING THE FORMAT AND NAME AND IT WENT THE WAY OF THE EXPORTS AND THE COMPANIES.MANY OF THESE COMPANIES WERE BUILT FROM THE GROUND UP BY PEOPLE WITH COURAGE AND A DREAM AND DESTROYED BY FACELESS BASTARD ENORMOUSLY OVERPAID NON PATRIOTIC NON HUMAN ENTITIES .HAVE YOU READ ABOUT OUR CONSTITUTION 1901 IT HAS BEEN DAMAGED, ALMOST DESTROYED BY THE SAME PEOPLE AND REPLACED BY THE FABIAN NON ELECTED AUST ACT 1973 (NO REFERENDUM NO LEGALITY )BUT THE HIGH COURT STILL YELLS IN A WHISPER THAT COMMON LAW AND MAGNA CARTER STILL STANDS BUT JUST DONT TRY TO USE IT.THEY APPARENTLY HAVE A MONUMENT TO THE MAGNA CARTER IN CANBERRA JUST TO KEEP THE COLOUR OF LAW VISIBLE IF NOT ACTIVE, APPARENTLY AUSTRALIAN LAW IS PRESUMED LAW ,YES ITS JUST LIKE IT SOUNDS.SERIOUSLY . I THINK THIS IS GOSPEL THOUGH IM NOT A LAWYER AS YOU CAN SEE BY MY SIMPLE RAVINGS NOT INTERJECTED WITH NON INTELLIGIBLE LEGAL DRIVEL. READ UP ON THE LIMA CONVENTION A PRECIS ON TREASON AND AN EXPLANATION AS TO WHY WE PROBABLY COULDNT MAKE A SCREWDRIVER ANYMORE AS THE UN WONT LET US ANYWAY BEST SISES AND REGARDS PAUL
The land owner has to be the state because rates are merely rent by anther name and to whom does one pay rent to? If we owned the land we could evict anyone we wanted to. Try evicting a council health inspector. They could not make all impose any building conditions upon us. But then how many people could lose all privacy and make their properties worthless. Without building restrictions a multistory block of flats could be built 2 meters from a single story house. How long would it take for a brick to land on their roof in the middle of one night from the say, the 10 story? How do we accommodate the need for sanctity of alloidial title and the safety and security of others?
Where is the third question?
Huh? There is no third question.
I definitely want to learn more from you guys
I have been following Wayne Glew’s stoush with Geraldton City Council. Wayne cites also, that council is not a valid tier of Government, which may be true, however, when Wayne presented this argument in an earlier case GLEW & ANOR -v- SHIRE OF GREENOUGH [2006] WASCA 260 the judge, Wheeler JA gave a lengthy, detailed and referenced response when awarding the case in favour of the Shire of Greenough.
One of points raised was in relation to the referendum question on local government being defeated…… “Because it was defeated, there is no Commonwealth constitutional requirement that a State provide a system of local government. However, the absence of a requirement to establish a system of local government does not imply any absence of power to do so. Each state has always had, pursuant to the power to legislate for the peace, order and good government of that State, a power to set up a system of local government as the State sees fit.”
I suggest all those, such as myself, who would love Wayn’e argument to have legs, read the following document.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiQpLix9onoAhXfyDgGHSwfBNYQFjAAegQIBxAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fjade.io%2Fsummary%2Fmnc%2F2006%2FWASCA%2F260&usg=AOvVaw2dtcAx9SfRBEN49VAQGMt9
If we are going to win this battle, we need to have a rock solid understanding that can take us to where we need to go.
The argument in the paper above at this point seems like a more reliable one, but only if again, we are well versed in the logic.
This is the argument the States and Councils always give. But it is predicated on a false idea. The FACT is, Wayne is right because in 1973 Gough Whitlam took HM Queen Elizabeth the Second out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 by changing the Royal Styles and Titles Act. We have published several articles on this website over the years that explain this, but this article sent to us by Dick Yardley lays it out very clearly:
https://www.cirnow.com.au/challenge-to-professor-anne-twomey-et-al/.
By taking the Queen out of the Constitution Whitlam committed HIGH TREASON. All legislation, laws, acts, etc passed by any parliament since then, and all judicial sentences since then are all NULL AND VOID. Therefore, the State Parliaments are sitting in treason and therefore they have no authority to pass any laws. They are, in effect, a criminal corporation masquerading as a government, giving themselves powers they are not entitled to.
Watch this video as well to get more background on what is happening today as we battle to get back under our Consttutional law.
https://youtu.be/GgW8xEFPOpI
Thanks for the information
It’s appalling that we put up with this.
Hayes was declared bankrupt.
He also managed to get himself sent to prison:for non payment of rates in 2012. We are still waiting to see anyone comprehensively win a council rates tax challenge in a court especially in OZ where State courts uphold State statutes every time. The Australia Act will have to be taken down first. A race for justice before an economic and social collapse.
Sorry – a huge flaw in your opening argument. Yes – when a referendum is voted “Yes” by a majority of voters in a majority of States / Territories, it becomes a change to the Constitution and therefore ‘law’. BUT if the vote(s) are “NO”, then the result simply stays as a ‘failed’ referendum. It has absolutely no force in law. None at all. I’d love you to show me the exact Section of the Constitution that states a failed referendum result is binding. I bet you can’t
This is a really silly, false and ignorant article. The 2 failed referenda on Local Government were to establish LG as a recognised third tier of government independent of State Government (for State LGs) or Federal Government (in the 2 Territorial LGs). What this does not mean that is that the current reality of Lg being wholly and solely a Department of the local “state” government. (ie Lg is the Department of Local Government in NSW.) All “law” that Councils enforce [such as levying rates] are State Regulations (Laws) not laws invented by Lg. It is concerning that some rabid LGs are making up laws on all sorts of things (always in the left wing nutter “social activism” arena that LG does not have the power to make or enforce). On those issues they are using “Bluffers Law”. Esentially, as it stands, LGs are a local representative for State Govt and at least have elected Leaders rather than Bureaucrats in the State Office of Local Government making ignorant decisions on local issues. Lg is actually the ONLY arena where WE THE PEOPLE can exercise our right to having our will recognised and done – because we have the ability to change who WE elect to represent us in LG. It is only in Lg that members are regularly thrown out at the ballot box for failing to do the will of the people. In the big “cities” LGs are much more of an issue as they tend to be a training/breeding ground for State and Federal political parties and their corrupt agendas. But rural Councils do their absolute best to serve their communities and ARE held to account if/when they fail. I for one and very glad that the area of rural remote NSW I live in is not “administered” only by bureaucrats in Sydney that have never been west of the Blue Mountains…
You are assuming that the government is lawfully constituted…. Ever since Whitlam took the Queen out of the Constitution we have not had a lawful government. Do the researh.
Could you please tell and advise me, how can dogcatchers do what they do through QCAT Tribunals. Using itself as a Kangaroo Court Hearing’s of a case On dangerous dogs? Without being issued to a National Recognition Certificate Course, dogcatchers are issued With discretionary powers without AQF Qualifications 2019 Permission to destroy a person dog on a in-house Rubber stamp certificate, Given them full power to do what they like, permission Is granted from Queensland Minister for Councils, when their is an available registered Course Known a as MWDS, which the QPS use To train their Police dog, which the High Courts have already Recommend To Councils and the RSPCA use to temperament Test a dangerous dog wouldn’t it cut the cost of the Security Industry Training Act 1993 employing accredited Trainings and Occurred keeping cost down, when Queensland Councils will be protected from 5 minute contracted Dog wonder Ever testing a dog on a 5 minute course run by a Councils Level IV In administration and infrastructure sometimes it cost these Councils $500,000 to run through the Courts then it all fails Councils are left the expenses when people get their dog back is the effect a Specialised field has when registered under the ANQNF.
The answer is in the article.
Can you send me a copy of the constition please that’s legibal , can’t read this one , interested in the council part
Try this one: https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth1_doc_1900.pdf
We must all stand together against the unlawfull socalled govenment ,we have lots of groups basically working towards the same thing FREEDOM
Wow l never knew about those laws.. Does that mean i can have a dog and l don’t have to pay any REGISTRATION fees… And no parking fines?? Or unlawful property tax’s??
Yes, it means exactly that. So when they demand money with menaces, as they do, ask them to show PROOF that they have the authority and that they are not working for a private registered corporation.
Mike, I understand you have got a Supreme Court of Victoria matter and I view the best is to lodge an OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION. I read a tweet you posted and extensively posted Authorities that you can use for that, but you can always email me to get the list, etc.
Thankyou. I dont pay rates anymore as decided to rent as I was over paying for the upkeep. rates etc .
I wish I known this before. I find in inconceivable that everyone pays different rates . Same service to everyone but if you live in a better suburb they victimize you because you’ve worked hard and can afford to be there.
Council rates are out of hand . Too many employees doing too little. Why are we paying for parking when our car registration pays for the roads. snd gives us the right to use them .
Tasma, before you go off at the deep end to fight the UNCONSTITUTIONAL council rates do keep in mind that unless you can present your constitutional arguments you may be defeated and then besides the cost it could be used against others that you were defeated. Best is to watch others who may have more skills (and I do not refer to the creeps calling themselves lawyers) who can put of a good case! If you really desire to do good work then all you need to do is to spread the word and that is plenty and by this prevent you to be financial harmed. I have a 7045 pages complaint regarding the “covid scam” with the Australian Federal Police and they have done nothing against me, and neither been able to remove any of my publications because they are well aware I rely upon my constitutional rights. I pursue the TRAITORS/TERRORIST and their collaborators to be held legally accountable and to seek to achieve that requires a lot of work. We need to pursue legal accountability for the harm and deaths they caused.
Jannet, that’s called coercion which is against the law. Should have found out who the criminal was who got in touch with the ‘licencing’ department and sued the backside off of him.
The other thig is, the ‘bills’ they send you are ONLY invitations to enter into commerce with them. If you don’t want to enter into any commerce with the, DO NOT open the article and write on it ‘Unclaimed – return to sender’.
It then becomes their responsibility to ‘pay’ the bill.
My comment is to ask if first nation peoples are sovereign peoples of their sovereign lands, how does the two questions affect or impact them?
Instead of segregating the original people start realizing that we are all Australians. It is up to us to work together as equals.
Randal, I have extensively canvassed some of the history of New Holland as it then was and before. The Framers of the Constitution never referred to “First Nations”, “indigenous Aboriginals”, traditional custodians”, “traditional owners” as they were all made up in recent decades. Just check out my blog if you desire to do so.
As a constitutionalist on 19 July 2006 (representing myself) I defeated the Commonwealth and 9 Attorney-Generals in both appeals in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on constitutional grounds that the part of “compulsory” voting was unconstitutional, etc.
I am now in a gigantic legal dispute with Banyule City council for many years where it trespassed upon my property to try to find “evidence” in violation of signs ‘ENTRY PROHIBITED” by them trespassing upon neighbouring properties and then climbing over the fence to gain unlawful entry. I have now stopped paying the “council rates” allegedly being “State delegated land taxation”. My blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati has considerable details about it all. There can be no question that the High Court of Australia in 1904 made clear that municipalities have no taxation powers. (Sydney municipality v Commonwealth) However it then claimed that the State can legislate for taxation to be collected by the municipality by assessment of property value. It is a very legalistic issue that I address on my blog extensively and will do even more in the next few days. However, regardless if the State could or could not in 1904 delegate taxation powers to a municipality by 11 November 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate as to Land Taxation and then the “concurrent” legislative powers of a State regarding “land tax” came to an end. While N.S.W. government claimed that in 1953 the land taxation powers was returned to the states, without any evidence proving to have been so. Reality is the constitution doesn’t provide for such a system to return “concurrent” legislative powers once it became “exclusive” Commonwealth legislative powers. The issue is not if municipalities can raise taxation as the High Court in 1904 declared they cannot, but rather if the State has itself legislative powers for land taxation as if it has not, as I pursue, then it neither can delegate such alleged land taxation powers to municipalities. For the record those who desire to download from my blog are NOT faced to pay me even a single cent as I do not charge for this downloading, this as JUSTICE cannot be sold. Now you may also understand why there is a political persecution against me!
When you go to ” contact us ” the link saying contact us by email dosent work it just goes to a blank page
That’s because the MyWill campaign finished ages ago. These are old comments.
The 1974 and 1988 referenda did NOT ask if we approved of local government – that’s nonsense. What the referenda did is ask us to vote regarding funding (1974) and Constitutional recognition (1988) of local government. Please get it right.
Brendon, why do you think they were asking for funding? The Australia Act was supposed to usher in a new Nation, but as Hawke never bothered to get it ratified by a referendum, Councils could not go to the Federal government to get funding for their attempt to be a 3rd tier of government. They only way they could do that was by asking the Fed government to fund them, and they tried to do that with these referendums. But the Australian people are not that stupid… well, a majority of us anyway. We saw through their ploy and Councils have never had the approval of the People voting in a referendum.
Absolutely brilliant thank you so much for bringing this info into the light I will be using those exact same arguments in court against vic pol
Support the national Australian strike and remove this traitorous belligerent occupiers of our country.