Questions for “Authorities”

Questions Authorities don’t want to answer

We can’t find the Launceston Community Law Group in existence any more. But they put out this questionnaire a few years ago and we think it’s worth reproducing here….keep asking questions everyone. Make them squirm. Make them uncomfortable. Make them ashamed. 

Launceston Community Law Group

“By stepping outside the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia: Codes and Ethics: Code of Conduct: Scope of Office a person changes the matter from public into private, meaning that they can be held liable in their own private capacity.”

“It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.”
Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief Prosecutor, Nuremberg Trials

Under the Nuremberg Trial verdicts: One of the results of the Nuremberg trials, that have been adopted world-wide, stated that “even if you are obeying orders when committing a crime, you are personally guilty of that crime.” This is confirmed by any Commonwealth or State laws.
(Criminal Code Act 1995, Crimes Act 1914, Criminal Code Act 1924)

 

Waiting4Answers

 

——————————————————–

(If you want to do something to stop the criminal corporate political parties continuing to destroy our nation and our Democracy, sign up for free at Advance Australia Group. We are not a political party. We are a political group of Australians who want to bring back the rule of law under our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901….Click here to Sign Up!)

——————————————————–

Questions that Must be Asked

Click on images to read information on images

These questions have been put to lawyers, barristers, QC’s, magistrates, police commissioners, prime ministers, governor generals where they refuse to answer which goes to show that they may be committing acts of treason, treachery and sabotaging our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK.

1- Is the ‘Australian Government’, ‘Australian Parliament’ a de-jure government/parliament, and are they the same Commonwealth entities as it would have been at federation?

Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK prescribes our government as the ‘Government of the Commonwealth of Australia’. Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK prescribes our parliament as the ‘Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia’.

Aus govt registered USA2- Is this ‘Australian Government’ a corporation registered to the UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, CIK#0000805157?

If you go onto sec.gov and do an EDGAR search and type in ‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’ you can see that it is a company registered to the UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE BANK and that there are company filings such as tax returns, reports etc. It has existed since 1934. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is not Commonwealth of Australia.

3- Does all legislation that is relied upon by the Australian Government carry the correct Royal  Seal and Royal Assent according to law?

Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK states that at section 58 that the Queen gives Royal Assent. Queen Victoria or her heirs and successors sit under the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

4- Has all legislation since federation been passed under our de-jure Government  of the Commonwealth of Australia and our Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia?

Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK states that we have agreed to be united  in an indissoluble federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great  Britain and Ireland.

5- Has all legislation been passed since federation in accordance with Commonwealth Statutory Rules, Vol III, Judiciary to Navigation, 1901-1956, pg. 2609, Orders 1:5A?

Orders 1:5A states that an ‘Act (legislation)’ also has to be an ‘Act (legislation)’ of the UK Parliament

6- Has all legislation been passed since federation with respect to the Authorized King James  Bible?

Our de-Jure Commonwealth of Australia is born out of the Authorized King James Bible and you can’t be a Constitutional lawyer without knowing this.

7- Has all legislation passed since federation, changes in government department names,  anything that alters our Commonwealth of Australia been passed via referendum pursuant to  section 128 of our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK?

In our de-jure Commonwealth of Australia we are meant to have democracy, any new laws  bought in, repeals and amendments must be voted on by the Australian people.

Aus govt treasonHere is a list of illegal acts committed by this unconstitutional Australian Government.

  • i) Their ‘Acts Interpretations Act 1973’ unlawfully removed without referendum pursuant to section 128 of our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK our ‘Government of the Commonwealth of Australia’ as prescribed by our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK and replaced it with their corporate ‘Australian Government (COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA)’.
  • ii) Their ‘Acts Interpretations Act 1973’ unlawfully removed without referendum pursuant to section 128 of our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK our ‘Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia’ as prescribed by our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK and replaced it with their corporate ‘Australian Parliament
  • iii) Their ‘Australian Citizenship Act 1973’ unlawfully removed without referendum pursuant to section 128 of our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK our allegiance as ‘British Subjects’ and replaced it with their corporatised ‘Australian Citizen’ aboard their corporate ship.
  • iv) Their ‘Death Penalty Abolition Act 1973’ unlawfully removed the death penalty for committing treason if the Australian people ever woke up to what is going on. At law the death penalty for treason still exists.
  • v) Their ‘Banking Act 1973’unlawfully removed Banks from being of the Commonwealth of Australia to their COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
  • vi) Their ‘Lands Acquisition Act 1973’ unlawfully gave them the right to take land belonging to the Commonwealth of Australia whenever they want. This is Spoils of war
  • vii) Their ‘Statute Law Revision Act 1973’ unlawfully took out ‘of the Commonwealth’ and took over all our assets including our military thus making them mercenaries. This is Spoils of war. viii) Their ‘Banking Act 1974’ unlawfully removed ‘Commonwealth of Australia’ of bank notes and replaced with ‘Australia’.
  • ix) Their ‘Governor General Act 1974’ unlawfully took our Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia, put him into their COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and therefor he does not represent Her Most Excellent Majesty.
  • x) Their ‘Parliament Act 1974’ was to determine the position of a new parliament house for their corporate foreign Australian Parliament which is not our de-jure Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia as prescribed by our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900
  • xi) Their ‘Australian Federal Police Act 1979’ created their own Australian Federal Police under the corporate Australian Government and does not protect the people of our de-jure Commonwealth of Australia.
  • xii) Their ‘High Court of Australia Act 1979’ created their own High Court of Australia under the corporate Australian Government which is not a High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  • xiii) Their ‘Judiciary Amendment Act 1979’, Gough Whitlam created a fictional Queen of Australia, a statutory instrument of no lawful authority.
  • xiv) Their ‘Evidence Amendment Act 1979’. The Private Corrupt Corporate High Court of Australia with its own Judiciary Act and its own Evidence Act under the Australian Government and its Parliament of Australia, none of which has Authority over the People of the  Commonwealth under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK.
  • xv) Their ‘Australia Act 1986 Act’. This Act was to bring the States into conformity with the Foreign Parliament of Australia and its fictional Queen of Australia.
  • xvi) Their ‘Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1988’ which amended Section 80,  replacing “common law of England” with “common law in Australia” of the Judiciary Act 1903 No 6. Therefore, giving all rights and assets to the Foreign Parliament and corporate Australian Government by removing every right of the People of the Commonwealth of Australia.

8- Has all legislation passed since federation been passed by monarchs that sit under the  Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland?

Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK states that we are under the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

9- Has all legislation passed since federation been by members of the upper and lower house  that are sitting correctly in office and are not dual citizens?

Members of Parliament must swear an oath in accordance with section 42 and schedule 1 of  our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK. If members of Parliament are of  allegiance to a foreign country they must vacate office pursuant to section 44 of our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK.

10- Has all legislation passed since federation been passed in accordance with our  Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK and its Letters Patent 1900 UK?

11- Are there any supporting documents that have received Royal Warrant: that confirms the Australian parliament and the State and Territories are permitted to change the swearing of oaths?

12- Are all Writs/Warrants written in the name of our Sovereign lady the Queen Victoria or Her  Heirs and successors?

13- Have all States and Territories received Royal Warrant to be able to enact their State and Territory constitutions?

14- Have all States and Territory Constitutions been constructed within the parameters set out  in our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK?

15- Is the Removal of the Crown or anything to do with the Crown to limit the power of the  Crown a breach of the alliance and an attempt of sabotaging our Commonwealth of Australia?

  • – Acts Amendment and Repeal Act 2003 unlawfully removes ‘the Crown’ and replaces with ‘the State’.

16- Can the Federal: State: and: Local Government provide the documents with Royal Warrant that show that they have the authority to make and enforce laws?

17- Are Federal, State and Local Government acting within our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK?

18- Has Local Government (councils) been constructed in accordance with our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK? Australians clearly voted ‘No’ in 1988 to a third tier of government.

19- If any of the members of the Parliament that have not sworn their Oath in accordance with Sections 42 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK and its schedule: the 1900 UK Letters Patent this would mean that they are in breach of section 44s of the Australian Commonwealth Constitution 1900 UK the 1900 UK Letters Patent. This would mean that they  are in breach of the Parliament rules and are not able to give the vote to create laws?

20- Is the Australian Government a de-jure Government?

21- Are Australian birth certificates being traded on the stock exchange? Birth Certificates are  printed on bond paper, they have a metal strip embedded into them.

22- Have the 4 conventional and: 5 stylized versions of the Commonwealth of Australia Coat of  Arms that are illustrated in the Australian styles manual 6th edition 2002 on page:296- 297 been issued Royal Warrants?

23- Are Australians being treated as if they are in the military due to the consignment of the conventional title Mr, Ms, Miss etc? Page 516 of the Australian Government Styles Manual 6th Edition 2002 tells us that conventional titles get treated that same as the lowest military rank aboard a ship.

24- Are all legal: lawful binding documents written in accordance with the Australian Styles Manual 6th addition?

25- Are all legal: lawful binding documents written in accordance with the English Styles  Manual?

26- If you change the name of the Commonwealth Government to that of Australian  Government without following the correct procedures (by way of Referendums) is that not an attempt to overthrow the Commonwealth Government of Australia?

27- What date was the last Act passed by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia?

28- How can the Australian Government change a Commonwealth Government department without referendum?

29- What date did Australia received Royal assent to change from the Great Seal of Great Britain and Ireland?

30- How does one amend and alter Commonwealth acts without following the Commonwealth Statutory Rules 1901 to 1956 and the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK and: the Letters Patent 1900?

31- Are you a man (male and female) or a person?

32- Are you aware that the Commonwealth of Australia is under administration by a foreign  power where the laws of armed conflict apply, usufruct etc

33- Is the Australian Defence Force today the exact same Commonwealth entity as it was at WWI with the ANZAC’s?

34- Why have Commonwealth Government Offices been privatized thus making them legally separate from the Commonwealth?

35- Are you of the Commonwealth of Australia?

36- Does the Australian Government, State/Territory Governments, Local Governments,  Australian Federal Police, Politicians, Lawyers, State/Territory Police Forces, Courts, prison system serve in the best interests of the Australian People or do they prefer to disregard our rights and our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK in the pursuit of gaining profits due to our ignorance?

37- Are Australians being treated as if they are wards of the state and debt bonded slaves to the International Monetary Fund?

38- Did the 1930 Geneva Convention suspend our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK?

39- Are driver’s licence and automobile registration a lawful requirement to hold if one travels privately from point A to point B without acting in commerce (carrying consigned goods) in their automobile?

40- Are Australians lawfully required to pay council rates/taxes?

41- Is an all capital name such as ‘JOHN DOE SMITH’ a corporate trademarked entity and is not  the same as the natural man John Doe of the Smith family?

42- Is it a lawful requirement for one to do ‘Work for the Dole’ related programs in order to receive Centrelink?

soros-mal-turnbull43- Is Malcom Turnball’s ‘No Jab, No Pay’ legislation lawful and in accordance with our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK?

44- Are State and Territory Police personnel officers of the Commonwealth?

45- Is the Australian Dollar a lawful currency? Dollar means debt in latin

46- Is the term ‘address’ and ‘post code’ of a military nature?

47- Where in our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK is the provision for a Prime Minister and political parties?

48- Are Australians being unlawfully denied due process of the law in courts?

49- Are all justices of the peace, magistrates, judges, coroners etc been sworn in pursuant to the Judiciary Act 1903? In April 2015 acting Attorney General Vanessa Goodwin came out to the public with a news article that Justices of the Peace, Magistrates, Coroners had not been sworn  in correctly for over 30 years. Section 9 of the 1869 Promissory Oaths Act Tasmania states that once an incorrect oath has been sworn that they must vacate office even if they swear the  correct oath afterwards. This section is also the same in section 7 of the 1868 Promissory Oaths  Act UK. The Tasmanian Parliament unlawfully created retrospect legislation being the Promissory Oaths Act 2015 Tasmania.

50- Why has the Education department stopped teaching Latin and our Commonwealth of  Australia Constitution 1900 UK in schools? Is this so Australians fail to realize what is going on?

51- Does the term ‘legal’ mean the undoing of God’s law?

52- Is a defendant a killer, slave, murderer, devil etc?

53- Does the term ‘nice’ mean foolish and stupid?

54- Is breach of allegiance to our de-jure Commonwealth of Australia treason?

55- Are Australians insolvent?

56- Are all alleged liabilities (debt) lawful?

57- Is the Australian Tax Office an illegal entity?

58- Is the Australian Government’s Coat of Arms being the emu and kangaroo registered to the US Trademark Patent Office?

59- With the majority of Australian manufacturing disappearing and being sent to offshore countries along with call centres, is that because of the unlawfully signed Lima Declaration?

60- Is the unlawful Australian Dollar a fiat currency which is not backed on the gold standard?

These questions have been compiled by a well-researched group of Australians who are tired of this country being torn apart due to corrupt politicians, greedy bankers and unlawfully sitting judicial officers.

What if I was to tell you that not one piece of legislation since 1901 may be valid???????????

– Many Australians including me have done extensive research over the years to find that not one  piece of legislation passed in the state of Tasmania or Australia since 1901 may be valid.

Reasons for this are as follows but not limited to:

  1. Not carrying the Correct Royal Seal and Royal Assent
  2. Does not abide by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 and its Letters Patent
  3. Does not abide by Commonwealth Statutory Rules Orders 1:5A
  4. Does not abide by the AKJV Bible
  5. No referendum via Section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900
  6. Members of Parliament must be sworn in correctly
  7. Must carry the wax seal of Australia and Scotland
  8. Be passed by the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

This argument was used by a good mate of mine in the Devonport Magistrates Court in 2015

Valid precedent at Law:

Devonport Magistrates Court.

Case complaint number: 51841/15:

Listing: Michael-Grant Nibbs V. Western Prosecution Services

A request for production of supporting documents to validate laws claimed and relied on by the prosecution was ordered by Magistrate Mckee at the Devonport Magistrates Court in Tasmania, on the 13th day of October in 2015.

Precedent and relevant point at law:

(Audio file time approximately 01:10:100).

“I understand Michael’s argument and it is fairly simple that any laws that have been passed since 1901 in Australia and the state of Tasmania are invalid because they didn’t put the correct seal on and the laws prosecution is relying upon do not exist and if prosecutions were to proceed any further they would have to address the seal argument.”

Despite the request to do so by the judiciary in a local court and on record the prosecution replied directly to Michael;

“Dear Mr Nibbs,

On the last occasion, your matter was in court, his honour Magistrate Mckee directed  prosecution to circulate further material as to what charge and associated particulars Prosecution seek to amend.

I write to advise both you and the Court that when this matter is again before the Court on the 26th November, 2015, Prosecution will tender no evidence, meaning that the charge against you will (subject to the Courts discretion) be dismissed.”

Oliver K Hinns, Western Prosecution Services.

Prosecution Correspondence.

Dated 19th day of November 2015

 

——————————————————–

(If you want to do something to stop the criminal corporate political parties continuing to destroy our nation and our Democracy, sign up for free at Advance Australia Group. We are not a political party. We are a political group of Australians who want to bring back the rule of law under our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901….Click here to Sign Up!)

——————————————————–

References:

-Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 UK and its Letters Patent 1900 UK

-Authorised King James Version Bible

-Commonwealth Statutory Rules, Vol I, Vol II, Vol III, Vol IV, Vol V

-Annotated Constitution by Quick & Garren

-Nuremberg trials, Project Blue Sky, Agenda 21, New World Order, Legal Name Fraud

-Http://www.austlii.edu.au/

-Etymology Online, Hansard Manual

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *