Step-by-Step Process to enter into Lawful Rebellion

By DAVID ROBINSON·MONDAY, JULY 7, 2014

LAWFUL DISSENT STEP BY STEP PROCESS.

1). Send an oath of allegiance to one of the barons committee. Here’s one we made earlier:

EDIT: 18/07/2019. We were asking members to send an Oath of allegiance to one of the barons…not necessary to do that only to create one, sign it get three witnesses to co sign it and it becomes a lawful instrument…..

Magna-Carta-Sign
King John signs the Magna Carta at Runneymede

Or you can serve a Notice of lawful objection onto a crown agent (police chief etc) to declare your standing under the Magna Carta Article 61….the oath is so that we have evidence of our standing according to law….for more on all of this please read the Layman’s Guide to Lawful Dissent.

Example of an oath of allegiance to the Barons.

UPDATE. 14th Jan 2015: Alternatively, because at least some of the barons are ‘turncoats’ and dishonourable, declare that you are standing under article 61 to the corrupt judiciary or the imposters within Westminster in a lawful Notice or Affidavit (any public servant or alleged authority figure will suffice), stating that you back the invocation of article 61 if not the barons who invoked it. The whole point is to be able to prove ‘intent’ so that it cannot be propagated that we are outlaws. We stand fully under the common law as it demands we must, and have a lawful duty with ‘lawful excuse’ to reject any and all alleged authorities that operate under the crown.

(Added 13th Feb 2015…..ATTENTION THE FOLLOWING BARON IS NOW DECEASED AND THE SON DOES NOT HOLD OFFICE SO PLEASE RESPECT HIS WISH AND DO NOT SEND YOUR OATHS TO HIM…. There are another 21 barons who’s addresses are in the files to consider).

Sent by recorded post. Date: To: Lord Craigmyle (Ashburne the leader has dementia and Rutland seems to be dodgy. Masserene is having recorded delivery stopped by all accounts and Hamilton has since died).

From: (Your name and address).

Dear Lord Craigmyle, In full knowledge of treason being committed in Parliament, by delivering the Sovereign Peoples of this Common law land into the hands of foreign powers, in understanding of some wrongs done by the present holder of the office of Sovereign, from whom I now transfer my allegiance, do willingly and wholeheartedly enter into lawful dissent, and I solemnly swear upon my Oath to obey the lords of the barons’ committee whom invoked lawful Dissent, in accordance with article 61 of Magna Carta until such times as redress of these present wrongs is achieved and, as long as said barons act strictly according to law.Sworn and subscribed on the

(Date)
Signed:

A similar declaration, or just stating that you are standing under article 61 in a notice or affidavit, provides you with evidence of your lawful and peaceful standing. You have removed the presumption that you are a legal fiction and that you are not standing under their legalese nonsense. Everybody in this realm must stand under the constitution it is treasonable to deny it at this time especially, but always of course. Going after the individual making demands on you with a demand that they must also be standing under said article before you can give them any support, gets them on the back foot. Its undeniable as the evidence of this is indisputable.-This is a basic template of an Oath. You can add to it or change it as you like.

For example where it states that “I solemnly swear upon my Oath to obey the lords of the barons’ committee whom invoked lawful rebellion, in accordance with article 61 of Magna Carta until such times as redress of these present wrongs is achieved….. Maybe add ‘..as long as the committee of the barons abide by the constitution without deviation’ or something similar?… We will only obey the direction of the barons if they stand by the letter of the constitutional law.

They invoked Article 61 for the people to use and they too have a constitutional duty to stand with us and abide by the law or commit treason themselves!…. where are they today?

GOOD BLOODY QUESTION! (we are working on this).

EDIT 18/07/2019: They are impotent so we have to take control. The barons were acting for the sovereign people by invoking Article 61 anyway.

Keep a copy of the Oath or declaration so you can provide evidence of your standing. You can have 3 witnesses sign it too if you want to (not really necessary) but it gives the document more clout as it becomes a lawful/legal instrument.

Keep the postal receipt and oath together as proof of your standing, you are now NOT an outlaw you are standing fully under constitutional law/common law. Check on the mail website ‘track and trace’ for confirmation of delivery. Write down when it was delivered, time and date, receivers signature or take a screen shot as proof that it was received. These are the 4 barons who delivered the petition to the office of sovereign. You don’t need to send an Oath the them just one to any of them of the committee. Hamilton has passed away, the other 3 are not receiving them.

Edit 18/07/2019: You don’t need to send an Oath to a baron.

This is the minimum required to be fully standing under common law today. You may not be in a position to do much more than this, except perhaps to question any demands that are made on you by the state however, we can all help get the police back on the side of the people, so we require those of you who can make a more determined effort (without having dependents who rely on you for example, single mums taking this stance may get a visit from the Social Services to intimidate and threaten them, its how these morons work) to stand in rejection of the regime (without giving up any entitlements), and for us all to ‘Lobby the Bobby’ and help us educate the police. They are not all bad and some support what we are doing.

Report the matter of treason to the police or a justice of the Peace. The treaty of Nice is a treasonous treaty which was the focus of the barons committees’ petition. It has never been redressed or repealed. Treason has become institutionalized in Britain for 104 years now (1911 Parliament Act). Here is some useful treason evidence.

EDIT: 18/07/2019: The treason file FCO 30/1048 is the most undeniable and damning evidence of treason that there is. The evidence proves that Edward Heath and co knew they were committing high treason. The documents still remain within the National Archives today.FCO 30/1048 pdf file: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/acft/FCO+30+1048.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1UOuHFU8uzsJtw8Rw8hkveNpJIMbIASbiwl86f7wO7BECDNLIYweIhaJc

A long range deception strategy to create a single Federal European state with the erosion of each nation’s sovereignty, currency and the powers to determine its own laws and affairs, was finalised by the Geo-political centre of the third Reich in Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war, militarily, they should continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically, through corporatism (aka fascism), and political subversion. Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled ‘Europaische wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (public document worldcat. OCLC number 31002821). Translated into English as ‘European Economic Community’. The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty:https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/The_Europeische_Wirtschaftsgemeinchaft_Berlin_1942.pdf?token=AWwAnzu5hsJBIHmfykNZRa1kzhqT238GAcE8CdiO8S-NpcD8rnpmfu18zkhyh4qeDQfBFyinKObuSndjtnSyKFhbK-i8Gxm8rw6ohSxJfsCMfcQAQIWTfeapik0kScrreOfrkYPOnmwEVhZ73BPKQajwh8UD03FqrdxmFpWqSTJ92A

Since the end of the war diverse treasonous persons, groups and movements with this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as the European Union.

The involvement of the United Kingdom in this agenda began in 1948 with the formation of the European movement. This was a state funded Anglo-French pro-federal European lobbying body posing as a non-governmental grass-roots pressure group.

The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European integration and a European constitution.The first move toward a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly, it was the signing of the treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archived documents from the period 1970-72 which shows the deceit perpetrated by the “ruling elite” at the time and these documents have been released after the thirty year rule. (entitled ‘FCO 30-10/48 Shoehorned into the EU’. A compilation of nearly 300 documents copied from the original documents which are still in the public records office today.The common law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and dictates that we are all born free to do whatever we choose for ourselves provided we do not cause harm, injury or loss to another’s life, liberty or property or their rights to life, liberty or property.England, within the United Kingdom of Great Britain is a common law jurisdiction and British parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender land or transfer, even temporarily, sovereignty except when conquered in war.

The Magna Carta 1215
The Magna Carta 1215

No man (neither monarch, nor prime minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge or public servant) is above the common law of Great Britain that forms the British constitution (Magna Carta 1215, the Coronation Oath Act 1688 and the Act of Union succession and settlement 1701-1707.

The Declaration of Rights 1688 is an un-rebutted claim of Right by the people and therefore beyond the reach of parliament and still stands to this day. The Declaration includes the clause: No foreign prince, person, prelate state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. This is mirrored in the Bill of Rights 1689 which still stands as legislation.

EDIT 18/07/2019: The Dec & Bill of Rights are Statutes and therefore not constitutional documents. The Bill of Rights further usurped the monarchs duty to be the sole trustee of the peoples sovereignty with regard to passing government Bills into law (Royal Assent). It was a treasonous Bill which was not understood by myself at the time of writing.

Treason in statute law was redefined by the Treason Act 1795 for the principal forms to include;

a) compassing the death or serious injury of the sovereign or his/her spouse or eldest son;
b) levying war against the sovereign in his/her realm, which includes, any insurrection against the authority of the sovereign or of the government that goes beyond riot or violent disorder;
c) giving aid or comfort to the sovereign’s enemies in war time.

Treason at common law is the offence of attempting to overthrow the Government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.Sedition at common law means overt conduct such as writing, speech and organization that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.The evidence presented in the FCO 30/1048 ‘Shoe horned into the E.U.’ files shows that the Heath Government of 1972 was well aware that an essential loss of national sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passing of the European Communities Bill and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to the people, which of course it was not. This in itself is an Act of Sedition at common law.

The passage of the European Communities Act in 1972, establishing the principle that European law would always prevail over British law in the event of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the British parliament, was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Heath administration.The signing of the single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain’s independent decision making powers further by extending qualified majority voting in certain areas of policy making, was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Thatcher administration.

The signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin document 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the Queen in parliament to an unelected body in Europe, this was an Act of Treason at common law by the Major administration.

The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Unions powers for action at community level. This included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. This was an Act of Treason at common law by the Blair administration.With the full knowledge of this Treason and to escape prosecution, the Blair Government repealed the Treason legislation in section 36 of the ‘Crime and Disorder Act 1998.’ abolishing the death penalty. This included the repealing of the Treason Act 1795. However, the crime of Treason at common law still stands as common law has primacy.The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the E.U. Constitution in 2004 were further Acts of Treason at common law by the Blair administration.

In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution, the Blair Government removed the word ‘sovereignty’ from the oath of office of constables in the police reform Act 2002 (section 83), and also modified the legislation to enable non British nationals to become officers (section 82). These are acts of both Sedition and Treason at common law by the Blair administration.

The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy including that relating to immigration and borders. This was an Act of Treason at common law by the Brown administration.The recent Prime Minister David Cameron, by denying the British peoples right to a referendum on the European Union, and by surrendering further powers to the E.U. for direct taxation on the British people, and by allowing the EU to end the British rebate via further proposed treaties is evidence to prove that this is an Act of Treason at Common Law by the Cameron administration. The treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an independent audit by professional accountants of their books in at least 17 years. One year of non- publication is a criminal offence. In fact, its financial accounts have been disapproved by the E.U’s own court of auditors for the past 17 years running. This crime has already been reported to the UK Serious Fraud Office by former MP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to him that the remittance of British taxpayer’s funds into the hands of this criminal enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.

You may be told to go to the Met police or special branch with the allegations and evidence. The fact is that every constable has a duty under the law to accept and investigate evidence of a crime, which means that if they will not accept the evidence and give you a crime number then that is a ‘serious neglect of duty and misprision of treason’.Record the attempt as evidence and serve Notice on whosoever refuses to accept the evidence. Making a complaint is the norm but the IPCC and CPS are all in on this too, they simply ignored us. This simply proves that you have attempted to report the matter and you are then free to serve treason notices on any other public servants (without being hypocritical) or, anyone else who has not declared their oath to the common law via the barons invocation of article 61.

I, for example, served misprision of treason notices on a chief inspector of police, an alleged court manager and legal adviser even Dominic grieve the previous attorney general. Not one dared to even respond to this notice.

3). Serve a notice of understanding of misprision of treason. This is a template for use as a guide only. Create you own version:

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING OF MISPRISION OF TREASON

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.

Respondent: Chief Supt. Simon Nickless doing business as; Divisional operations manager

Mansfield Police Great Central Road Mansfield Notts.

[NG18 2HQ]It is a LAWFUL requirement under British Constitutional law, which has primacy over Admiralty rules, that if an individual or individuals believe a possible crime has been committed they have to report the same to a justice of the peace as soon as possible. To not report the crime is indeed another crime. Therefore, we, the undersigned injured parties, sui juris sovereign men and women under the Common Laws of Britain and the Commonwealth, are competent to state that the following matters are true, correct and complete, presented in good faith, and not intended to mislead.

WHEREAS, it is our understanding that: (same as previously provided above)

1). A long range deception strategy to create a single federal European state with the erosion of each nation’s sovereignty, currency and the powers to determine its own laws and affairs, was finalized by the geo-political centre of the Third Reich in Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war militarily, they could continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically, through corporatism, and political subversion. Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (Public document WorldCat OCLC number 31002821) translated in English as ‘European Economic Community’ which is presented as evidence. The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.
2). Since the end of the war, divers treasonous persons, groups and movements with this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as the European Union.
3). The involvement of the United Kingdom in this agenda began in 1948 with the formation of the European Movement. This was a state funded Anglo-French pro-federal Europe lobbying body posing as a non-governmental grass roots pressure group. A document outlining the detailed origins of this movement is presented as evidence.
4). The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European Integration and a European Constitution.
5). The first move toward a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly. It was the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and The Netherlands.
6). Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archival documents from the period 1970 – 72 which shows the deceit perpetrated by the ruling elite at the time and these documents have been released after the thirty year rule.
7). The Common Law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and dictates that we are all born free to do what we choose for ourselves provided we do not cause harm, injury or loss to another’s life, liberty or property or their rights to life, liberty or property.
8). England, within the United Kingdom of Great Britain is a Common Law jurisdiction and British Parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender, lend, or transfer, even temporarily, sovereignty except when conquered in war.
9). No one (neither Monarch, nor Prime Minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge or public servant) is above the Common Law of Great Britain that forms the British Constitution (Magna Carta 1215, the Coronation Oath Act 1688 and the Acts of Union, Succession and Settlement 1701-07).
10). The Declaration of Rights 1688 is an unrebutted claim of right by the people and therefore beyond the reach of parliament and still stands to this day. That declaration includes the clause “…no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.” This is mirrored in the Bill of Rights 1688/9 which still stands as criminal legislation. Said Bill overthrew the Queens duties under the Coronation Oath by parliament declaring that the royal prerogative could only be used with the backing of a government minister. The prerogative is the sole duty of the holder of the Office of Sovereign (queen).
11). Treason in statute law was redefined by the Treason Act 1795 for the principal forms to include:a) compassing the death or serious injury of the sovereign or his (or her) spouse or eldest son;b) levying war against the sovereign in his (or her) realm, which includes any insurrection against the authority of the sovereign or of the government that goes beyond riot or violent disorder;c) giving aid or comfort to the sovereign’s enemies in wartime.
12). Treason at Common Law is the offence of attempting to overthrow the government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.
13). Sedition at Common Law means overt conduct, such as speech and organisation, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.
14). The evidence presented in the FCO 30/1048 ‘Shoe Horned into the EU’ files shows that the Heath Government of 1972 was well aware that an essential loss of Britain’s sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passage of the European Communities Bill and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to the people, which of course it was not. This in itself is an act of sedition at Common Law.
15). The passage of the European Communities Act in 1972, establishing the principle that European Law would always prevail over British Law in the event of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the British Parliament, was a criminal act of treason at Common Law by the Heath Administration.
16). The signing of the Single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain’s independent decision-making powers further by extending majority voting in certain areas of policy making, was a criminal act of treason at Common Law by the Thatcher Administration.
17). The signing of the Maastrict Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin document of 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the Queen in Parliament to an unelected body in Europe was a criminal act of treason at Common Law by the Major Administration.
18). The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Union’s powers for action at Community level. This included further European integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. The signing of this treaty was a further act of treason at Common Law by the Blair Administration.
19). With the full knowledge of this treason and to escape pending prosecution, the Blair Government repealed the treason legislation in section 36 of the Crime and Disorder Act of 1998, abolishing the death penalty. This included the repealing of the Treason Act of 1795. However, the crime of treason at Common Law still stands as Common Law has primacy. A document outlining these changes to the statute is presented as evidence.
20). The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the EU Constitution in 2004 were further acts of treason at Common Law by the Blair Administration.
21). In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution, the Blair Government removed the word ‘Sovereign’ from the Oath of Office of Constable in the Police Reform Act 2002 (s.83) and also modified the legislation to enable non-British nationals to become officers (s.82). These are acts of both sedition and treason at Common Law. A document outlining these changes to the statute is presented as evidence.
22). The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy including that related to immigration and borders. This was a further crime of treason at Common Law by the Brown Administration.
23). The Treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an independent audit by professional accountants of their books in the last 14 years. One year of non-publication is a criminal offence. In fact, its financial accounts have been disapproved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors for the past 14 years running. This crime has already been reported to the UK Serious Fraud Office by former MEP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to him that the remittance of British taxpayer’ funds into the hands of this criminal enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.
24). A signed letter written to former constable of Thames Valley Police, Albert Burgess, from Leolin Price QC on the subject of the Heath treason evidence states that the case he (Burgess) puts forward is ‘arguable’ and does ‘merit serious consideration and investigation’. To the best of our knowledge, this letter is authentic and a copy is presented as evidence.
25) The Six EU treaties since 1972 are unlawful and should be struck completely from the statute books.

THEREFORE, be it known to you that in accordance with your oath of attestation to Her Majesty the Queen, it is your sworn duty to investigate and bring to justice, in an acceptable and timely manner, the perpetrators of these crimes against us. We consider these the greatest crimes perpetrated against this country and its people in a thousand years. Those responsible must be brought before a properly convened court de jure and tried by the people under the Common Law of this Land.WE NOW AFFIRM that all of the foregoing is true and correct and that we are of lawful age and competent to serve this Notice. We hereby affix our own signatures to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all our natural unalienable rights and our specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which we have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.

Signed this _______________ day of __________________________ the year of our Lord 20??.

Name:___________________________________________________

Signature:____________________________

Address:________________________________________________

Name:___________________________________________________

Signature:____________________________

Address:________________________________________________

Name:___________________________________________________

Signature:____________________________

Address:_________________________________________________

Name:___________________________________________________

Signature:____________________________

Address:_________________________________________________

N.B. Anthony Charles Lynton Blair attempted to repeal the 1795 treason Act but he had no lawful authority to do so therefore it still stands to this day. Blair was guilty of treason already whilst he made the attempt and thus had no authority as a traitor of the realm.

Example of Notice of treason template 2.

To:

From:

Sent by first class recorded post.

Date.

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING OF MISPRISION OF TREASON AND INTENT

Notice to principle is notice to agent notice to agent is notice to principle.

Dear……………….

Doing business as (DBA) (whatever capacity). i.e. police constable, Legal adviser etc…

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE THOROUGHLY AND CAREFULLY. IT IS A NOTICE. A LAWFUL DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE. IT INFORMS YOU. IT MEANS WHAT IT SAYS. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS OF THE UTMOST URGENT NATURE AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE AND URGENT ATTENTION!

Please be aware that failure to Act upon this ‘notice’ in accordance with the 1795 Treason Act which being the current law of this realm, contravenes the lawful duty of every/any British sovereign man/woman within or without the realm of the United Kingdom and is an OFFENCE under the ‘ Misprision of Treason Act 1795,’.whereby;..’it is an OFFENCE’ at common’ law (“misprision of Treason”-see Halsbury’s statutes, 4th edition vol 11,p.818 ) for any person who knows that Treason is being planned or committed, and not to report the crime to a justice of the peace.

Also be aware that the penalty for committing ‘Misprision of Treason’ in this day is life imprisonment and total asset striping. And that my sole intention in informing you of this fact in law is one of duty and not malice, frivolity nor ill will.

As you have made UNLAWFUL DEMANDS on the person (legal fiction, and/or have advised me to comply with statutes by threat of enforcement, and that you are acting for a corporation whom have committed the crimes of sedition and treason at common law (evidence herein supplied), and that I DO NOT and WILL NOT support FINANCIALLY OR IN ANY OTHER WAY this evil treachery, indeed our constitutional law FORBIDS ME TO DO SO. it is therefore my intention and lawful and honourable duty to inform you that although your actions must be deemed to be the will of your peers and in your apparent ignorance at this juncture in time.

YOU MUST NOW BY THE COMMON LAWS OF THIS REALM with the evidence herein supplied, DESIST ALL ACTIONS pertaining to the will of said peers in light of the evidence that has NOW been OFFICIALLY presented to YOUR PERSON in good faith by lawful notice.

Failure to do so is an Act of Hgh Treason at common law.

It is my honourable intent, as one sovereign being to another, and so that I may not be coerced into ANY CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by supporting this EVIL and TREASONOUS CORPORATION that you do represent, to inform you of YOUR CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT and CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS against the Person, and that if you do not CEASE IN ALL ACTIONS pertaining to the will of your peers IMMEDIATELY upon receipt of this lawful notice, it shall be my lawful duty to report the evidence, that which would be a copy of this Lawfully served ‘Notice of understanding of Misprision of Treason and intent’, to a Justice of the peace for your alleged involvement in these crimes.

THEREFORE, where it is to my understanding and evidenced herein that: (Again Repeated as above)

1. A long range deception strategy to create a single Federal European state with the erosion of each nation’s sovereignty, currency and the powers to determine it’s own laws and affairs, was finalized by the Geo-political centre of the third Reich in Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war militarily, they could continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically, through corporatism, and political subversion.Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled ‘Europaische wirtschaftsgemeinschaft ‘ ( public document worldcat OCLC number 31002821). Translated into English as ‘European Economic Community’ which has been herein presented as evidence. The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

2. Since the end of the war, divers treasonous persons, groups and movements with this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as the European Union.

3. The involvement of the United Kingdom in this agenda began in 1948 with the formation of the European movement. This was a state funded Anglo-French pro- federal European lobbying body posing as a non-Governmental grass roots pressure group. A document outlining the detailed origins of this movement has been presented herein as evidence.

4. The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European integration and a European constitution.

5. The first move towards a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly, it was the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

6. Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archived documents from the period 1970-72 which shows the deceit perpetrated by the ruling elite at the time and these documents have been released after the thirty year rule.

7. The common law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and dictates that we are all born free to do what we choose for ourselves provided we do not cause harm, injury or loss to another’s life, liberty or property or their rights to life, liberty or property.

8. England, within the United Kingdom of Great Britain is a common law jurisdiction and British parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender, land, or transfer, even temporarily, sovereignty except when conquered in war.

9. No one ( neither monarch,nor prime minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge or public servant ) is above the common law of Great Britain that forms the British constitution (Magna Carta 1215, the Coronation Oath Act 1688 and the Act’s of Union succession and settlement 1701-07).

10. The Declaration of rights 1688 is an un-rebutted claim of right by the people and therefore beyond the reach of parliament and still stands to this day. That declaration includes the clause no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. This is mirrored in the Bill of Rights 1689 which still stands as criminal legislation.

11. Treason in statute law was redefined by the Treason Act 1795 for the principal forms to include; a) compassing the death or serious injury of the sovereign or his (or her) spouse or eldest son; b) levying war against the sovereign in his (or her realm), which includes , any insurrection against the authority of the sovereign or of the Government that goes beyond riot or violent disorder; c) giving aid or comfort to the sovereign’s enemies in wartime.

12. Treason at common law is the offence of attempting to overthrow the Government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.

13. Sedition at common law means overt conduct such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

14. The evidence presented in the ‘shoe horned into the EU ‘ files shows that the Heath Government of 1972 was well aware that an essential loss of British sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passing of the European Communities Bill and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to the people, which of course it was not. This in itself is an Act of Sedition at common law.

15. The passage of the European Communities Act in 1972, establishing the principle that European law would always prevail over British law in the event of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the British parliament, was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Heath Administration.

16. The signing of the single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain’s independent decision making powers further by extending majority voting in certain areas of policy making, was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Thatcher Administration.

17. The signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin document 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the Queen in parliament to an unelected body in Europe this was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Major Administration.

18. The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Union’s powers for action at community level. This included further European Integration in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened Europol. The signing of this Treaty was a further Act of Treason at common law by the Blair Administration.

19. With the full knowledge of this Treason and to escape prosecution, the Blair Government repealed the Treason legislation in section 36 of the ‘crime and disorder Act’ of 1998, abolishing the death penalty. This including the repealing of the Treason Act 1795. However, the crime of Treason at common law still stands as common law has primacy. A document outlining these changes to the statute has been presented herein as evidence.

20. The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the EU constitution in 2004 were further Acts of Treason at common law by the Blair Administration.

21. In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution the Blair Government removed the word ‘sovereignty’ from the oath of office of constables in the ‘police Reform Act 2002 (section,83), and also modified the legislation to enable non British nationals to become officers (section.82). These are Acts of both Sedition and Treason at common law. A document outlining these changes to the statute’s has been presented as evidence herein.

22. The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy including that related to immigration and borders. This was a further crime of Treason at common law by the Brown Administration.

23. The Treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an independent audit by professional accountants of their books in the last 14 years. One year of non-publication is a criminal offence. In fact, it’s financial accounts have been disapproved by the EU’s own court of auditors for the past 14 years running.This crime has already been reported to the UK serious fraud office by former MP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to him that the remittance of British taxpayer’s funds into the hands of this criminal enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.

24. A signed letter written to former constable of Thames valley police, Albert Burgess, from Leolin Prince Q. C. on the subject of the Heath Treason evidence states that the case he ( Burgess ) puts forward is ‘arguable’ and does ‘merit serious consideration and investigation’. To the best of my knowledge the letter is authentic and a copy has been herein presented as evidence.

25. The six EU Treatise since 1972 are unlawful and should be struck completely from the statute books. The evidence submitted herein is to my understanding precise and factual and is in no way whatsoever intended to ; deceive, mislead, cause mischief or as an act of frivolity or ill will, and it is to my understanding that this substantial evidence should be submitted by you IN IT’S ENTIRETY before a Justice of the peace as soon as you can reasonably do so.Let it be known to you that I have already submitted this evidence myself to the proper lawful authorities.I have served upon Her majesty Queen Elizabeth II, two lawful, officially witnessed and signed affidavits that does ; ”

Remove myself from All and Any Allegiance to Elizabeth the Queen, to the purpose of removing myself at law from the authority of all of those hateful and evil persons who have taken it upon themselves to hold Elizabeth the Queen a prisoner in her own land “.

I include a copy of my second affidavit (and a copy of its receipt of postage) as evidence herein and proof of my claims and lawful position so that you may have credible evidence of my honourable intent.THEREFORE, be it known to you that I the injured party do seek remedy and justice in requesting your assistance in bringing the perpetrator’s of these evil crimes before a justice of the peace.

As this matter is of the most serious nature, I give you what is deemed to be a reasonable passage of time to respond and, due to the severity of the offences herein alleged, that being three (5) working days after this notice has been served on your person, to provide and confirm to my understanding that YOU have reported said crimes to a justice of the peace, and have provided to me as evidence of such a copy of the crime report obtained.

For if I do not receive word from you within the time limit herein stated, I will be bound by duty and by law to report you to a justice of the peace for your alleged involvement in said crimes.

I consider these the greatest crimes perpetrated against the country and its people in a thousand years. Those responsible must be brought before a properly convened court de jure and tried by the people under the common law of the land.

I now AFFIRM that all of the foregoing is true and correct and that I am of lawful age and competent to serve this ‘Notice of understanding of Misprision of Treason and intent’. I hereby affix my own Name to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my natural inalienable Rights and my specific common law Right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.without frivolity, vexation, insincerity, malice or ill will and, on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and, with all my inalienable, indefeasible common law rights reserved. Without any admission of liability whatsoever.

Printed/Stamped Name. Signed….Date.3 Witnesses.Enclosed documents as evidence;a) Copy of letter from Leolin Prince QC to Albert Burgess. http://roundholesquarepeg.co.uk/downloads_files/A%20Guide%20to%20Reporting%20Treason%20%26%20Sedition.pdf
b) Document pertaining to ‘police reform Act 2002 sec, 82/83.http://195.99.1.70/acts/acts2002/en/02en30-a.htm
c) Public document ‘WorldCat OCLC number 31002821.http://www.worldcat.org/title/europaische-wirtschaftsgemeinschaft/oclc/31002821&referer=brief_resultshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Community
d) The origin’s of the European movement. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Community
e) Documents pertaining to the repealing of the Treason Act 1795 & the repeal of section 36 in the crime and disorder Act 1998.http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1517296&parentActiveTextDocId=0&showAllAttributes=1&hideCommentary=0&suppressWarning=0&versionNumber=1
Anyone not declaring their standing and backing the barons petition of 2001 is acting in treason;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1327734/Peers-petition-Queen-on-Europe.html

Is to be “compelled” by law to make that standing.From Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215:
“laying the transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay. And if we shall not have corrected the transgression (or, in the event of our being out of the realm, if our justiciar shall not have corrected it) within forty days, reckoning from the time it has been intimated to us (or to our justiciar, if we should be out of the realm), the four barons aforesaid shall refer that matter to the rest of the five and twenty barons, and those five and twenty barons shall, together with the community of the whole realm, distrain and distress us in all possible ways, namely, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, and in any other way they can, until redress has been obtained as they deem fit, saving harmless our own person, and the persons of our queen and children; and when redress has been obtained, they shall resume their old relations towards us. And let whoever in the country desires it, swear to obey the orders of the said five and twenty barons for the execution of all the aforesaid matters, and along with them, to molest us to the utmost of his power; and we publicly and freely grant leave to everyone who wishes to swear, and we shall never forbid anyone to swear. All those, moveover, in the land who of themselves and of their own accord are unwilling to swear to the twenty five to help them in constraining and molesting us, we shall by our command compel the same to swear to the effect foresaid. “https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/Concise_MagnaCarta.pdf?token=AWwbt8V2Gn1O4XNYqJ9lhOExk0SZTbmJuyb1wQxgcJpTgho96kFJScxRKwKcqATGRHSpcV_begwztpm3rW65rcPMD9LmdYbOqmT2HVx68iRiWjXU08-7BQw4p4hLIhmIm9lE8GERt6PmXCuEc3auA72JxIK7_nV6_kxkw82r9fhW0A

This is a sound defence when done correctly. The lawful truth nor due process of law can be denied without committing high treason.Whereas Blair did not lawfully repeal the death penalty for high treason, anyone notified of the treason along with evidence to support the claim MUST report the crime to a justice of the peace or police constable, or be guilty of at least ‘misprision of treason’ – To know of an Act of treason being planned or committed within or without the ream of Britain and the Commonwealth but not to report the crime, will be guilty of the same. Life imprisonment and total asset stripping is the penalty.If you do this process correctly ‘they’ whosoever they maybe, the individual acting as a man or woman in the public, will be forced to retreat or commit treaon themselves.

We must deny the corrupt courts jurisdiction and demand ONLY properly convened court de jure (court with a jury under common law). It is treason to deny or delay your right to due process of law. Its a check mate move.

Always keep the peace, act with honour and without fear and follow the process through to its conclusion. Do not begin this process if you are not prepared to follow it through completely.

What has been provided here is the very basic requirements to stand lawfully and peacefully against the regime and, to combat unlawful demands made upon you.

There is no guarantee that this process will work for you as it has for me, this is just my experience thus far, all demands stopped so no reason to think otherwise. This is not to be taken as legal or lawful advice, it is a process that I have used myself that worked, therefore I am sharing my experience and process with you purely on that basis. We are dealing cheats, liars, and disgusting criminals in high office especially. Those on the ground working as ‘useful idiots’ (compounding treason) must still be informed and treated with respect, at least to begin with. The game changes once they have been informed of their collusion in the treason plot. This is a way to educate police et al when normally they would brush you aside without so much as a glance at what we are stating.

Lawful Dissent is a personal choice but also a lawful demand to take up. It is a moral endeavour and integral. I will NEVER support child abuse, war crimes, terrorism or genocide etc….so for me I have to do something and this is the only solution that I can find that works. They are afraid of the individual more than a collective as an individual cannot be infiltrated. When enough of us individuals make our stand and reject the regime en masse they are fooked!

Peace.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Step-by-Step Process to enter into Lawful Rebellion”